Seymour Benzer: humor, history, and genetics

March 19, 2014 • 5:53 am

Perhaps you aren’t aware, but Matthew is writing a book on the history of the genetic code—a book aimed at the scientifically-friendly layperson. In his research he sometimes comes across nice anecdotes or little nuggets of humor; and when he sent me this one, I demanded that he post it—with commentary—immediately.  This exchange shows, contra all those “anti-scientism” flacks, that we aren’t a pack of cold, humorless automatons! And there’s some science, too: Benzer was a remarkable, and remarkably smart, character.

Here’s Matthew’s post:

by Matthew Cobb

In 1965, Jacques Monod, François Jacob and André Lwoff were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work on the control of genes in bacteria and viruses. On hearing the announcement in October of 1965, a friend and colleague of the trio, US geneticist and prankster Seymour Benzer sent this letter to Monod:

benz1

In case you can’t read it, it says: “Dr A Lwoff / Dr  J Monod /Dr F Jacob  Mon cher collègue, Please accept my sincere condolences on the occasion of your being forced to share the Nobel Prize with those other two jerks when, in my opinion, you alone fully deserve it. With love, Seymour.”

On 31 December the trio replied in kind:

benz2

I came across these gems on the Institut Pasteur website while I was researching a chapter on Jacob and Monod in my book on the history of the genetic code (out on both sides of the Atlantic in mid-2015, folks!). The trio all carried out their research at the Pasteur lab, and Benzer worked there in the early 1950s, striking up close friendships with the French scientists. This letter is typical of Benzer’s mischievous sense of humour, which was legendary.

Benzer is now most widely known for his pioneering work on the neurogenetics of the fly Drosophila, work that he began in the mid-1960s. Among the things his group discovered were the genetic basis of biological clocks and the first learning mutant, dunce, a fly that couldn’t learn. (In fact, it turned out it could learn, it just forgot really quickly. Dunce was what convinced me to study Drosophila, starting nearly 40 years ago).

However, Benzer began his career in science with a PhD in physics; then, like many young physicists in the post-war world, he switched to biology. He joined the “phage group”, studying the genetics of viruses. From 1954- to the early 1960s Benzer spent his time studying the structure of small genetic region of a virus called the rII region. Using amazingly painstaking techniques, Benzer was able to describe the detailed structure of the region long before genetic sequencing was available, and to show that a gene is not a single unitary structure, but instead contains different regions with different functions. [JAC: before this work, it was widely assumed that genes were indivisible units.]

If you want to know more about Benzer, there’s an excellent book by Jonathan Weiner called Time, Love, Memory (1999), which concentrates on Benzer’s work on flies (and contains an uncredited photo taken by me on the left side of page 210). For a more in-depth look at Benzer’s work on phage, there’s Frederic Lawrence Holmes’ Reconceiving the Gene (2006).

Seymour died in 2007. You can find some nice obits/tributes here and here and there’s a huge oral history interview with him from 1990-91 here.

Images (c) Institut Pasteur.

***

JAC: I’ve added this photo of Benzer with a giant plush Drosophila (a smaller version sits atop my computer in Chicago).

Seymour_Benzer

24 thoughts on “Seymour Benzer: humor, history, and genetics

  1. Wonderful!! I had the great joy of hearing Benzer speak at McMaster University, in Hamilton, Ontario, a year or so before he died.

  2. I hope he actually sent the other two implied letters, or somebody might not have got the joke.

    1. Since the three of them replied in the response, this surely was the case. (Besides, it wouldn’t have been as good a joke if he only sent it to one of them!)

      1. I’ve always noticed that “getting” a joke is the same satisfying feeling I get from cracking the solution to a puzzle. Good jokes always have something unstated that the listener has to make a connection for himself. The beautiful clue here is how the two names were crossed off, and Monod’s was checked. That’s comedy genius.

        1. The comedy genius you see there is partly serendipity…
          One reason that the checkmark and crossed names appear there is because that’s the procedure that secretaries used when they typed multiples with carbon paper at a typewriter and sent them off to cc’d recipients.

          1. But that’s the comedy genius that I’m referring to – it’s not serendipity, that’s why Benzer did it that way.

    1. One reason that the checkmark and crossed names appear there is because that’s the procedure that secretaries used when they typed multiples with carbon paper at a typewriter and sent them off to cc’d recipients.

  3. I know we’re not supposed to say/imply that religionists are stupid, but is it possible that the reason they think we’re humorless drones is that our humor goes over their heads? L

    1. Yes, really clever humor requires nuance and subtlety which religionists seem to be unable to process.

  4. That is very funny! Jim Watson was a phage-ist wasn’t he? And Crick a physicist!

    No pressure on Greg then to produce a herpetology tome…!

  5. Wow. Benzer sounds like a really amazing person. Wikipedia mentions he discovered a Ge crystal capable of working at high voltages, which led to the transistor. More directly, I would have thought this work would have led to the development of radiation detectors with high energy resolution.

  6. Although Benzer wasn’t part of the Manhattan project, a fair number of physicists who worked on the Bomb moved to the biological sciences subsequently because they felt that such research would be of greater benefit to mankind .

  7. I became aware of Benzer’s work by reading “Time, Love, Memory” and I’ve always wondered: how come he never got the phone call from Stockholm? His achievements seem eminently worthy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *