Oprah Winfrey disgraces my alma mater

June 4, 2013 • 4:28 am

One of my friends went to Harvard’s graduation ceremony last Thursday, and I asked him who the main speaker was (the speaker at my own ceremony, when I got my Ph.D. there, was Alexsandr Solzhenitsyn).  When my friend replied, “Oprah Winfrey,” I about fell over.  Oprah Winfrey?  That peddler of woo, lachrymose feel-good guru, promoter of questionable science—she got an honorary doctorate of laws and gave the main speech?

I am appalled. Of all the substantive and non-wooish people Harvard could have lured with an honorary degree, they chose Oprah? Yes, I admire her work ethic and the determination that helped her attain superstardom by overcoming a horribly hard childhood and early life, but she’s still a symbol of attitudes that contravene the dictates of reason.

According to several accounts, her talk was just a string of platitudes—but of course nearly all graduation speeches are. The Reuters link above says this, for instance (but judge for yourself, as I’ve put the video below):

In a commencement address at the Ivy League school outside Boston, Winfrey told the graduates that they were bound to stumble no matter how high they might rise, but that “there is no such thing as failure — failure is just life trying to move us in another direction.”

No it isn’t, because “life” is not trying to do anything to us. Lord! Ceiling Cat!

At any rate, at least one major news outlet saw this degree for what it is: a tacit endorsement of woo and antiscientific attitudes.  At the Time Magazine “Ideas” site, rika Christakis and Nicholas A. Christakis note excoriate Winfrey and Harvard in a piece called “Oprah as Harvard’s commencement speaker is an endorsement of phony science”:

But Oprah’s particular brand of celebrity is not a good fit for the values of a university whose motto, Veritas, means truth. Oprah’s passionate advocacy extends, unfortunately, to a hearty embrace of phony science. Critics have taken Oprah to task for years for her energetic shilling on behalf of peddlers of quack medicine. Most notoriously, Oprah’s validation of Jenny McCarthy’s discredited claim that vaccines cause autism has no doubt contributed to much harm through the foolish avoidance of vaccines.

. . .But this vote of confidence in Oprah sends a troubling message at precisely the time when American universities need to do more, not less, to advance the cause of reason. As former Dean of Harvard College, Harry Lewis, pointedly noted in a blog post about his objections, “It seems very odd for Harvard to honor such a high profile popularizer of the irrational. I can’t square this in my mind, at a time when political and religious nonsense so imperil the rule of reason in this allegedly enlightened democracy and around the world.”

Indeed! What were the folks at Harvard thinking when they extended this invitation?

I am heartened, though, that the writers of the Time piece are both at Harvard, and were bold enough to speak out:

Erika Christakis, M.P.H, M.Ed., is an early childhood educator and Harvard College administrator. Nicholas A. Christakis, M.D., Ph.D., is a professor of medicine and sociology at Harvard University. The views expressed are solely their own.

Well, my Ph.D. isn’t worth a plugged nickel now. What if Chicago revokes my professorship?

If you want to see her Harvard speech, here it is. I can’t bear to watch.

63 thoughts on “Oprah Winfrey disgraces my alma mater

        1. So funny you should mention him. A few months ago a friend of mine who seems especially vulnerable to conspiracy theories & pseudo science (and she has a chemistry degree) recommended this guy when I told her my father had very serious cancer. My response was this when she called him “amazing” and forwarded a video (since taken down).

          On the surface it may appear to seem amazing but if you look at the comments, they are filled with people who believe in conspiracy theories like “death panels” with the Obama administration’s health care. I did more research and while I may keep an open mind if there have been success, what turned me off was that independent scientists have been unable to reproduce the positive results reported in his studies. So this is a big red flag if results are not repeatable.

          We haven’t spoken since (but my dad is much better).

          1. Without a framework of empirical restraints, any speaker will suffice. It’s the manufactured mana-personality (all pomp and no circumstance). Celebrity trumps competence … just ask Creflo Augustus Dollar, Jr.

    1. Don’t laugh–this year the scheduled commencement speaker was Ben Carson, noted neurosurgeon and disbeliever in evolution. I believe his is a Seventh-Day Adventist.

      He was retiring from JHU, though, and he’s a big name and a very very accomplished surgeon, and I doubt they surveyed the science faculty for their input before they picked him.

      But then he made some idiotic remarks about gays, with the typical references to NAMBLA and bestiality, which caused enough of an uproar that he disinvited himself.

  1. I’ve observed that in any large organisation it is the people who best ‘play the game of getting to the top’ end up at the top. Think politicians, Roman Catholic Church, large established charities.

    The aims of the organisation (like ‘veritas’) are the game board, not the reason for playing. It is therefore not so surprising that someone (Oprah) who has got to the top of their game should be recognised by other ‘winners’. They could have been more subtle about it though.

  2. Oh yeah?

    My alma mater is Washington University (the one in St. Louis). Among other accomplishments, it was the first school in the nation to admit women to the law school.

    The main speaker and recipient of an honorary degree a few years back? Phyllis Schlafly.

  3. I only went to my UCL BA graduation & there was no on outside the University of London as far as I recall – no daft/inspiring/insipid speech that I can recall. Didn’t bother for the MA!

  4. These days it seems celebrity trumps everything else and Oprah is unquestionably a big celebrity. Magazines such as Time delight in listing the most powerful men and women in America/the World and consistently film and tv stars come near the top (including Oprah) but it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Time say’s Oprah is powerful so everyone takes her views seriously no matter what they are, so her influence grows, so Time notes how powerful she is and on it goes.
    How sad, though, that an Institution such as Harvard should play this game.

    1. Perhaps Harvard should change its motto from veritas to fictum 🙂 It’s nice because it also sounds a bit like victim and it isn’t as harsh as falsitas.

  5. Oy vei. Glad I didn’t have to sit through that one. At my commencement from Harvard in ’86 Lord Carrington, the Secretary-General of NATO, was speaker, and though I don’t remember details I do remember it being portentous (especially in hindsight)regarding NATO’s prime objective of containing the Soviet Union. What I do remember vividly is seeing Lewis Thomas, Itzhak Perlman, Robert R. Wilson and Claude Levi-Strauss on the paltform receiving honorary degrees. Now that was cool.

  6. There actually is a lot of science substantiating the vaccine-autism link. If you want to fault her medical mis-information do so for her nonsense regarding hypothyroidism.

    Oprah is the epitome of mediocrity and an egomaniac. The few times I tried to watch her show she never let her guests finish a sentence. She is trite and boring – almost the lowest common denominator. What an insult to Harvard’s grads.

    1. There actually is a lot of science substantiating the vaccine-autism link.

      No, there is not. There is some discredited bad science, most of it shown to be simply fraudulent.

      1. Thank you for saying “bad science” somehow when I wrote my reply I just said “bad” — Freudian 😀

    2. There is no evidence of a link between vaccines and autism. Also the Andrew Wakefield study published in The Lancet was retraced. If you want to understand the damage done by nuts like Wakefield, McCarthy, and Winfrey (just to name a few) take a look at the recent measles outbreak in south Wales.

    3. As an immunologist, I can assure you that there is no decent science which supports that potential link, and a great deal of evidence against it. I recommend that you read “The Panic Virus” by Seth Mnookin, which summarizes all of the evidence in a highly-readable and coherent book. In my opinion, Oprah is at least partially responsible for the deaths of unvaccinated children because of her suggestions that this might actually be true. Shame on Harvard!

  7. At my graduation ceremony, we had a nun who’d dedicated her life to social work. Honestly, I was just happy to get my diploma.

  8. Oprah Winfrey disgraces my alma mater

    Actually, your alma mater disgraced itself by inviting Winfrey to speak.

    1. That was exactly what I was going to say! It amazes me that this is the most intellectually substantial person Harvard could come up with.

      I wonder if they just wished and hoped for Oprah to be a great mind and lo! She was! “The Secret” works even for Harvard.

    2. Agreed.

      Thank Wotan (or your favorite deity) they didn’t invite the Jersey Shore so-called stars

  9. Last time I listened to a commencement address at Harvard, it was Bill Clinton’s in 2007. What a fantastic speech. If you have half an hour to spare, listen to that one instead of Oprah.

  10. Shouldn’t Harvard be more worried about counting Amy Bishop and Ernst Hanfstaengl among several other notable alumni than Oprah Winfrey?

  11. I’m so glad you characterized Oprah as lachrymose because the speech looked like it was going to be lachrymatory in the beginning.

    So many of my friends love Oprah but I think they are starting to come around when I explain how she promotes “woo”.

  12. At least peddling woo isn’t the !*primary*! thing that she does (unlike Deepak Chopra). I admire her work promoting acceptance of gays, many of the selections of her book club, and her film productions, and (with reservations) her work for PETA, and her help in catching child molestors.

    But for someone in her position of high influence, she has certainly made some very bad judgment calls, supporting “The Secret”, Eckhart Tolle, etc. She is overly gullible regarding “feel-good” woo. She is oblivious to the possible harm this material can do.

  13. Meh, IMO speaker choice is more artistic expression than political statement; there’s simply no accounting for taste. And that goes whether it was the administration’s taste or the student body’s taste that lead to this particular choice.

  14. I don’t agree that her work ethic is admirable. What is it that she is burning the midnight oil doing? Figuring out how to get as much money as she can out of pandering to the credulous.

    I don’t care how much time and effort one puts into such an enterprise, I can’t respect that effort.

    I might be able to muster some respect for remarkable effort if the object of that effort had, at worst, a neutral impact on society. But Oprah’s efforts are too often actively deleterious and they proceed from selfish motivations.

    1. Interesting….I know she does do a lot of charity work. It would be fun to rack up the positive vs. negative costs and determine if Oprah is a force for good or evil.

      1. IMO, the intent behind the “evil” stuff (“omg, people eat this crap up; I need to get on that gravy train) cannot be “balanced” by establishing or supporting charities.

        We should all support deserving charities. That is not an impressive feat.

  15. Compared to some of the shit that comes out of the Business School, the Kennedy School, and apparently the Econ dept, Winfrey is a hard
    -nosed empiricist.

    Harvard courts celebrity — academic and otherwise — as part of its branding, which is about aspiring to and maintaining economic and cultural elite-hood. This is particularly true at Harvard College.

  16. Oprah’s reputation as a dispenser of woo no doubt has something to do with her association with the spiritual teacher Eckhart Tolle. Interestingly, Tolle’s book The Power of Now is cited as recommended reading by Sam Harris on his blog in the Eastern Philosophy/Meditation section. Doubt Harris would feature woo on his blog.

    Yes, Oprah’s open-mindlessness can be excessive and not all of her views overlap perfectly with science and reason, but your failure to adequately recognize the immeasurable charitableness and decency that Oprah has contributed to our world is positively shameful.

    1. Harris sometimes comes dangerously close to giving woo the benefit of the doubt: xenoglossy, consciousness surviving death, meditation/Eastern related stuff…

      Not to dump on Sam. I like a lot if his writing. But he’s given me reason to furrow my brow a few times.

  17. Well thank dogs that commencement speeches don’t have opening acts. It might have been Deepak Chopra.

  18. Well now most people don’t care I mentioned this to my 21yr old son,and believe me he didn’t care.

  19. I was equally appalled… I can’t even bring myself to watch her! Here’s one of my FB comments that describes my sentiment in response to someone who called her speech “Positive.” And that we could, “still admire her” even if we disagree with Harvard’s choice of Oprah Windbag (SIC Intended] to make the commencement speech.

    My comment:

    “I’d find it impossible to admire anyone who has given the amount of airtime she has to quackery. Her worst offense is when she gave space to the idiot Queen of the Anti-vaccine lobby, Jenny McCarthy for peddling her BS. Let’s not forget to mention Wankfield (SIC intended) ; the quack doctor who eventually got struck off from the British Medical Association register for his bogus research on Vaccines and Autism. He can never practice medicine in the uK again. The Lancet pulled the paper.

    She’s all what’s wrong with so-called mainstream television. Full of misinformation and other nonsense.”

    Why Harvard chose her is beyond me.

  20. I thought it was pretty cool when Michigan State had Berry Gordy as the commencement speaker, a few years ago. 🙂

  21. Aaugh! I’ve loathed Oprah for years – not just because she promotes woo and similar crap. She’s been incredibly lucky to rise from a horrible childhood to her current status (although O herself would surely say there’s no such thing as luck, it’s the Universe putting you where you’re meant to be, blah blah). She has so much power and influence, and she consistently misuses it such appalling, irresponsible ways. And she’s so bloody rich that it’s been years since she’s had a clue into how everyday people live and think. I tried to have a little respect for her based on some of the good she’s done, but she lost me forever when she started schilling “The Secret” and its ilk. And that EGO – JCA!(can I say that here?) It’s frustrating when you NEED to swear and “blasphemous” words are all you can come up with. If someone can point me to a non-religious list of oaths, please do so. In the meantime, I’ll brush off my Shakespeare and simply shout Goats and Monkeys!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *