Readers’ wildlife photos

July 24, 2017 • 7:30 am

Reader Don McCrady sent some astronomy pictures; his notes are indented:

I’ve been collecting some astrophotos this summer, and even an astro-video.  To start with, here’s a couple of recent images taken with my astro-rig.

This is the Iris Nebula, part of a vast complex of dust in the constellation of Cepheus.  The central portion shines with the bright blue reflection of the star SAO 19158, the rest of the nebula fading to a dim brown.  This image represents a total of 7 hours of exposure through separate red, green, and blue filters.

Here we have Sharpless 2-132, a very faint nebula in Cepheus, interesting because of the uneven distribution of gases which is evident by the clean separation of colours.  The blue areas are rich in Oxygen-III, while the red areas are rich in Hydrogen-alpha.  This was taken through Hydrogen-alpha and Oxygen-III filters for a total of 8 hours exposure.

For something a bit different, I’ve been experimenting with wide-field astrophotography, which is quite different from the pure technical telescope stuff.  These were all taken with an unmodified Canon 6D and tracked using a Vixen Polarie.

Here is a wide-shot of the Milky way stretching from Cygnus on the left to Sagittarius on the right, taken with a 16mm lens.  It’s difficult to find the bright constellation stars with all the smaller ones that pop out in a long exposure, but the Summer Triangle (Vega, Altair, Deneb) is clearly encompassed in this shot.

Here, Sagittarius and the center of the Milky Way rise above the mountains east of Rattlesnake Lake, Washington.  Several prominent objects are visible around the most prominent object in the center, the M24 star cloud.  Below it and to the right are the Lagoon Nebula and the Trifid Nebula.  Almost directly above M24 are the Swan Nebula and the Eagle Nebula.

The familiar teapot-shaped constellation of Sagittarius will never fully rise above the mountains.

Scorpius rises over the mountains near Rattlesnake Lake, WA.  Rho Ophiuchus and its colourful nebula complex are visible, as is the faint smear of globular cluster M4 right beside Antares, and the vast molecular clouds of the Sagittarius Milky Way are on the left edge of the image.

Finally, here’s a timelapse video consisting of 312 individual images of the Milky Way over Rattlesnake Lake.

I (mis)used the Vixen Polarie (lying flat, not polar aligned) to slowly rotate the camera from east to south at 1/2 the sidereal rate in order to give the timelapse some foreground motion.  I obviously didn’t level it since the end shot ended up crooked.  You can see that at some point while I slept, somebody blithely walked into my shot, totally oblivious with his lights.

Turn the sound on to hear “Lost Frontier”.

24 thoughts on “Readers’ wildlife photos

  1. I try to imagine the thrill of getting these results – there’s something about it – the Internet has tons of pictures like this, but when you DIY, there’s no comparison. The wealth of technology available to us now, compared to Galileo’s time …Hard to pinpoint what it is about this – well done? Obviously. Tedious and time consuming, and maybe cold? I bet. Wish I did it? More like it.

    1. … and when I see NASA photos like this, say with the Hubble or some massive telescope- I KNOW I’d NEVER do it myself… it probably takes a while team to do it after all…

    1. @W. Benson

      Yes, reason would say there’s life out there. But is there “anyone”? I think we’ll never meet anything we would describe as having personhood – only the equivalent of microbes.

      The picture of the Lion Nebula [Oxygen-III / Hydrogen-alpha] – reminded me of this interesting piece today on the amount of booze in space [in the interstellar medium]: http://theconversation.com/booze-in-space-how-the-universe-is-absolutely-drowning-in-the-hard-stuff-81122

      In the article I was struck by the density of molecules in a typical molecular cloud – in cold, dense regions it’s as much as around 10^11 molecules per m^3 [compared with 10^25 for our lower atmosphere], but still a very respectable vacuum. That ‘vacuum’ might be quite an impediment to gadding about in space at high speeds unless one is inside a substantial rock.

      Finding life with personhood within hailing distance & going to visit in a reasonably quick travel time [less than say 500 years] – probably isn’t going to happen.

  2. These are very, very beautiful, and every time I watch time-lapse videos of the earth slowly spinning it blows me away, but I can never really comprehend what I’m seeing.

    I really try, every time I watch a video like this, to get my brain to recognise what is happening; that the earth is turning in a huge almost empty room(very inexact comparison I know), and those stars are the dust hanging in the air, and even using a partial analogy, I still can’t get my head around it. It’s like trying to imagine a fourth dimension or picture particle spin. I guess we didn’t evolve to be capable of taking in this kind of stuff. Maybe one day we’ll be able to reconfigure our brains to be able to do so, but then we’d be taking away the awe and slight tinge of fear that comes from hitting our heads against the wall of comprehension.

    1. Yes, it is a bit startling. If you look on You Tube for time-lapse movies of the moon going through its monthly phases, you will see that it is hardly static. Although it shows the same side to us, actually it wobbles as it orbits the earth. It is pretty unnerving.

          1. Yes, strange. The address line seems messed up.

            You can find it by just searching:

            The Moon: an hour-by-hour Time Lapse Visualization for a Full Year!

      1. It’s called ‘libration’ isn’t it? Like a little shake of the hips.

        And it doesn’t show us its other side, which is ideal for the concealment of Nazi moon-bases and inspiring incredibly overrated albums.

  3. Phenomenal! A lot of time invested in these photos. The time lapse is especially beautiful. Rattlesnake Lake looks like gorgeous country.

  4. Thanks for this look to the “heavens”. The wide views are breathtaking in their expanse. I live near some city lights and among trees so I rarely have much of a view.

  5. Nice images and equipment. An apochromatic refractor is a fantasy astrophotography unit to me. I currently have an 8: SCT with a Losmandy GM-8 mount that I attach my SLR to the back of but I’ve been terribly negligent in using it, partially because of weather conditions & partially because I’m tired at night.

  6. It is well and good to be made very very small. Thanks for the brain health. I am something, but ultimately, I am nothing. And there is nothing wrong with that.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *