Nobody left a single comment on today’s Jesus and Mo post. That cannot stand—no such thing has happened since I started this website. Please go over and say whatever is on your mind, tell a joke, or whatever. Just one or a few comments would suffice.
No comments on Jesus and Mo
May 10, 2017 • 3:29 pm
I passed this news on in another post, but I’ll repeat it here. A New Zealand politician, when asked about what he thought of the repeal of New Zealand’s blasphemy law, said, “It’s about god damn time!” I love living here.
J&M is, as usual, biting and brilliant.
The comments have to be on the post here:
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/05/10/jesus-n-mo-n-blasphemy-2/
Unbelievable!!
We like J & M chez moi – hope it shows up all over the world in all languages!!
Gotta make inroads on “faith” as best we can.
Fact of the matter is: I don’t much care for the Jesus and Mo comics. Pretty much love everything else. It’s just my personal taste.
Righty ho you are, but are you willing to enlarge on the matter? Not that you need to.
I dunno. It is just not my brand of humor/social criticism. I read few comics.
Sub
Oh, it’s about a Tri level conundrum and all been said before. For me at least, time to move on. The bar maid is getting a bit stuck also. Need a new view rather than constant reiteration.
The commentariat is lacking in a sufficient sense of recursive irony. Clearly, the proper response is, yes, to go comment on the J&M strip…but to also refrain from commenting here, leaving this post without comments….
b&
That would’ve been great. Especially if it spawned a new post lamenting the lack of comments on this one. And so on…
Loopee!
I think Jesus and Mo say it all. Input from women? Hmmmm. Never thought of it. Ten steps behind and don’t speak unless. . .ð
What is
ð
supposed to mean?! Is it an emoticon?
I was going to, but you wrote “Here’s the strip, which needs no comment”, so I didn’t.
Don’t do what I say, do what I’m braining .
😀
Yes, I took that as an instruction.
Far be it from me to disagree with PCC(E)
😉
cr
There should be a word for this sorry state of affairs – blasphemy?
I love Jesus and Mo. Somehow this cartoon needed no comments. It was perfect.
Keep em coming. I love Jesus and Mo
Keep the Jesus and Mo on the blog. It often inspires the things I write about and I pass them on to my friends too. Especially my religious ones with whom I have a good relationship. This frequently leads to good solid conversations about their faith especially after what we have been through in East Timor, Afghanistan and Iraq
Apologies, I retw**t the J&M cartoon without crediting you. Makes for easy clicks. In my case you are talking to the converted.
Maybe there are finite ways to see the same simple stupidity. It must be difficult for Author to keep saying the same thing over and over. I know I ran out of things to add once I’d said my piece.
sad but true
Just subscribed to your site. Please keep showing us J&M.
Are we sheep?
Who jump to every command??
Seems if none of us initially chose to comment, and PCC(E) had to ask/command, it still goes down as a ‘no comments’ post.
No idea why that would bother any of us.
Each to their own eh,
Chris G.
Jerry, I had a request of you. If its not too much to ask would you please watch watch this coursera course on ‘science and religion’, and write a blog post with your thoughts on it? The course is by the University of Edinburgh, a well reputed institution, yet it seems to blatantly engage in religious apologetics with little regard to science. The lecture was so full of sophisticated sounding criticisms to science (and evolution in particular) that it made me positively nauseous. I was not fully able to put forward an adequate defense of science and thought your opinion on the course would help give me some clarity.
The course is titled “Philosophy, Science and Religion: Science and Philosophy” and has been uploaded by the University of Edinburgh.
https://www.coursera.org/learn/philosophy-science-religion-1#
That course is funded by the Templeton Foundation, showing again how its mission is to ride the coattails of science while at the same time dragging its reputation down.
Speakers mentioned on your link include Michael Murray (who I believe is the man who argues there may not be a problem of animal pain, because ‘perhaps most animals do not experience negative-feeling-pain (because they lack a [pre-frontal cortex])’ – see http://goodgrieflinus.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/craig-adds-to-pain.html), and Conor Cunningham, who thinks many evolutionary biologists are ‘Ultra-Darwinists’ – see Jerry’s take here https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/mark-vernon-out-of-his-depth-again/). So it does appear to be religious apologetics, rather than science.
I didn’t comment. I generally don’t on J&M posts. I did share it with friends, though. We all chuckled at how true it is.
I always go to the author’s site and am a paid subscriber. I’m sure the author likes to get as many hits a possible and a few contributions.