A new and legal way to read scientific papers, even if they’re behind a journal paywall

April 19, 2017 • 9:15 am

If you’re a scientist or a layperson who’s frustrated by the inability to access paywalled science articles (even if the research was funded by the public!), this is a browser extension you need. Called “Unpaywall“, it’s a free extension (go to previous link) Chrome and Firefox. You add it to your browser with just a mouse click, comme ça (click on screenshot):

Once you’ve installed the extension, and you get to a paper that’s paywalled, do this: if it has a green tab beside it, just click on the tab and the extension searches the web for author-loaded and other open-access versions of the pdf. This will be successful, the developers say, 60-85% of the time. (FAQ here).  And it’s perfectly legal; in fact, it was developed with grants from the National Science Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

Try it. If you click on the green button below and have the extension, you’ll go t0 a Nature article with a free pdf (just click the screenshot below):

Again, this is legal, and the site doesn’t collect information about you or your browsing habits. You can read more about it at the Unpaywall site, or at the article about the extension published at Open Culture.

I’ve added the extension, and recommend it. Published science should be free for all readers, especially because, at least in the U.S. and U.K., most published science is funded by taxpayers who support governmental granting agencies. It’s simply unfair to charge the taxpayer to access research they’ve already paid for!

If you’d like to see other free sources for reading journal articles, go to the list and links at MetaFilter.

h/t: Greg

26 thoughts on “A new and legal way to read scientific papers, even if they’re behind a journal paywall

  1. I downloaded the add-in to Firefox without any trouble. It will take a while to find out how many free versions of “locked” articles it can find.

    1. Yes! I thumb my nose at them as well. I used to be able to view research papers through my Portland State U. library. Now I can do so again thanks to Jerry’s help.

  2. Anybody compared that to searching Google Scholar that will indicate all copies of a PDF including any uploaded by authors on different sites?

  3. I just tried it on the first ten locked medical journal articles relevant to my practice that I found on PubMed and the extension went 0/10. Looks like the world of medicine has some catching up to do.

  4. It doesn’t seem like a real solution, just a convenient way to be redirected to arXiv (in the cases I checked) from the journal’s page. I think most scientist search there anyway, and it’s sort of a last resort because authors often forget to update the preprint to the version of the manuscript that eventually gets published.

    If only authors kept updated preprints there would be no need to waste taxpayers’ money on journals, but rather spend it on building a proper review network. That’s the only thing journals provide (when compared to e.g. arXiv) and they do it at a cost dictated by arbitrary profit rather than academic goals.

    So let them keep that business model and compete with scientists editing their own papers for free (as they do now), publishing the manuscripts online for free (as they do now), reviewing them for free (as the do now) and the funding going to those experts who wish to additionally undertake the job of editors – tied to research institutions and/or public repositories instead of for-profit intermediaries. Who knows, there might actually even be cash left for reviewers and authors themselves!

  5. Published science should be free for all readers, especially because, at least in the U.S. and U.K., most published science is funded by taxpayers who support governmental granting agencies.

    I speak as somebody who has never done any scientific research much less tried to publish a scientific paper but I imagine that there must be costs associated with such publications e.g. proof reading, type setting, peer reviews and so on. Are those costs paid by the research project? Because if not, I think it would be perfectly reasonable for a journal to charge a reasonable fee for access to articles it publishes.

    1. In the areas I’m familiar with the editing and peer reviews are by other academics, for free.

      In some high-volume areas (e.g. medicine) the journals do provide some service in type-setting etc, as I understand it.

      However, in my area (Statistics) all the publishers do is provide a web site and a latex style file, and then the academics do the rest.

      1. Same in Theo. Comp. Sci. The work done by publishers is minimal. And of course nothing of their — extremely large — profit margins ever flow the other way. In think it’s around 30% for Elsevier.

        1. Someone I know from the Computing and Philosophy conferences was/is in publishing, and pointed out that (perhaps oddly) the big European academic publishers are independent businesses and the US ones are associated with universities directly, so profit is not as big a deal. (I am not sure if that accounts for Harvard or Yale UP, though.) It is certainly true that the European ones are more expensive.

          1. Springer and Elsevier are the worst offenders and while, yes, they are European companies, I don’t think American researchers (at least in my field, TCS) are more equipped to avoid them than I am, given the near-monopoly they seem to enjoy on the impactful international conferences / journals.

      2. As someone from a non-profit scientific society, I can say that we do provide professional copyediting, proofreading, composition (typesetting), and more. We don’t have academics doing this for free, so anyone downloading our articles for free with this tool (and many other ways) does cause us concern in the long term.

  6. It works! Excellent.

    Making my way through the Internal Journal of Housing Policy rightn now /embarrassed

    I’ve noticed that the older the article/journal edition, the more likely there are to be free versions available. So if you can’t find free versions of an article that were published in this quarter’s edition, just wait it out.

    Super thanks for this, though I suspect my dropbox is going to fill up with unread PDFs again 🙂

    1. It just downloaded and installed fine for me. Will see how it pans out in practice.
      (Incidentally, the add-on has appeared on the “trending” part of Mozilla’s add-ons page.)

      1. Weird. I still cannot install it. I have tried both versions available. Also, I just downloaded and installed a different extension, so Firefox is not telling me everything is corrupted. The version I am trying to install is unpaywall-1.5-an+fx.xpi.

        I have emailed the creators of the extension, and I await their response.

Leave a Reply to jeremy pereira Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *