Wellington to Puhaka Mount Bruce

Yesterday (Friday), I went to the Pukaha Mount Bruce Wildlife Centre in the company of Phil Garnock-Jones, an emeritus professor of botany at the University of Wellington.

The Centre is about two hours north of Wellington, and on the way we passed the “Beehive“, the executive wing of the New Zealand Parliament. Built between 1969 and 1979, it’s controversial: most kiwis who told me about it couldn’t decide whether they liked it or hated it:

On the way, I saw a “kiwi crossing” sign but it went by too fast to photograph. But it looked a bit like this (landscape was different):

Only in New Zealand!

The Centre houses a largish tract of forest and also several wildlife exhibits, including kiwis, tuataras, and many birds.  Below is a kiwi chick: they’ve now hatched 100 from the radio-tagged kiwis who lay eggs on the property. Only about 5% of natural eggs survive because of predation and other factors, but when raised in the Centre, about 85% of the eggs produce kiwis that become adults. They’re raised to the point when they can fend off predators (they kick hard!), and are then released back into the forest.

Kiwis, of which there are five species (or three or four, depending on whom you ask), are all critically endangered as they breed slowly and are vulnerable to introduced predators. They are, of course, the national symbol of New Zealand, whose inhabitants are called “Kiwis.”

Here’s an adorable chick they showed for just a few minutes. It’s a North Island brown kiwi, Apteryx mantelli.

They had a white leucistic one, too, and several brown ones, but they are nocturnal and the exhibit is dark. You can’t and shouldn’t use flash, so my picture was horrible. But here’s a white kiwi chick hatched at the Centre, photographed by them. (As we’ve learned, leucism is not the same gene as albinism, and changes body pigmentation but not eye pigmentation.)

Photo by Mike Heydon

Kiwis lay the largest egg in relation to their body size of any bird: here’s how it looks via a reconstruction. Every organ must be squashed up inside! The presenter at the Kiwi House told us this is the equivalent of a woman giving birth to a six-year-old child!

More about kiwi reproduction from Wikipedia:

Once bonded, a male and female kiwi tend to live their entire lives as a monogamous couple. During the mating season, June to March, the pair call to each other at night, and meet in the nesting burrow every three days. These relationships may last for up to 20 years. They are unusual among other birds in that, along with some raptors, they have a functioning pair of ovaries. (In most birds and in platypuses, the right ovary never matures, so that only the left is functional.) Kiwi eggs can weigh up to one-quarter the weight of the female. Usually, only one egg is laid per season. The kiwi lays the biggest egg in proportion to its size of any bird in the world, so even though the kiwi is about the size of a domestic chicken, it is able to lay eggs that are about six times the size of a chicken’s egg. The eggs are smooth in texture, and are ivory or greenish white. The male incubates the egg, except for the Great Spotted Kiwi, A. haastii, in which both parents are involved. The incubation period is 63–92 days. Producing the huge egg places significant physiological stress on the female; for the thirty days it takes to grow the fully developed egg, the female must eat three times her normal amount of food. Two to three days before the egg is laid there is little space left inside the female for her stomach and she is forced to fast.

The kākā, (Nestor meridionalis) is the sister species to the kea, a bird I’ve already described. They’re more common than kea, and tend to hang around human habitats to beg or steal food. While eating lunch at the Centre’s cafe, Phil and I encountered one that flew down to the patio where we were sitting. They’re gorgeous birds, and just as fearless as the keas:

I didn’t feed them, as you’re not supposed to, but this one hopped from table to table looking for handouts. Each table also has a spray bottle of water that you can use to spray them if you want them off your table. Several people did that, but I thought it was horrible. Why would you spray one of these wonderful birds? Yes, keep your food away from them, but don’t spritz them.

This one went for the dregs of an iced mocha left at a table, using its tongue to lick the inside of the glass.

Brazen—right in front of a “Please do not feed the kakas” sign!

These people photographed the kākā but the sprayed it. Ingrates!

This guy had a tussle with the kākā over his plastic-enclosed sandwich. I would have loved to see the bird open it up.

Getting the crumbs:

Phil, like a good biologist, just sat there and photographed the bird as it sat on our table:

Here’s an Antipodes Island parakeet (Cyanoramphus unicolor), endemic to the Antipodes Islands off New Zealand. According to Wikipedia, it’s one of only five species of ground-dwelling parrots in the world:

Phil with a kõkako (Callaeas wilsoni), a very rare bird found on the North Island. It is large and has a beautiful gray color with blue wattles on either side of the beak. It’s endangered because of the usual factor: habitat loss.

A picture of the kõkako taken by Phil through the wire (he had a fancy Nikon digital SLR). Look at those blue wattles!

Here’s me with the bird; it liked me took from my hand leftover berries from the keeper’s feeding demonstration. We bonded. This was a hand-reared bird that was caught as a nest runt in the wild; it couldn’t call like a regular kõkako, but could wolf whistle like a human, clearly due to either visitors or a nefarious owner!

Here’s a tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus), a famous and iconic reptile. Found only in New Zealand, it’s the sole surviving species in the order Rhynchocephalia, which flourished during the Age of Dinosaurs: about 200 million years ago. It’s a “living fossil”, and its sister group is (lizards + snakes).

They appear to begin breeding at about 25 years of age (!) and are said to live up to 100 years in captivity, though that’s not certain. I’m sure Greg will post some more about this either here or in the comments.

[Further notes on tuatara by Greg Mayer:  WEIT readers may feel a stir of recognition when viewing this fellow, because I think we’ve met him before, in a picture taken by a friend who visited New Zealand several years ago. It looks like the same exhibit, and tuatara are, as Jerry notes, long lived, so my first guess would be that it’s the same guy. I’m not sure this is the first tuatara Jerry has seen in life, but I’d wager it’s the first one he saw in a photo, and then in life!

Tuatara are the primitive sister group of lizards and snakes, lacking the fully developed hemipenes (dual penises) characteristic of the latter two, and retaining the lower temporal arch of bone below the lower of the two openings in their cheek bones (although it has been proposed that the lower temporal arch in tuatara is a reversion to the primitive state, and not a retention of the ancestral condition).

They are perhaps best known for being the sole survivor of the order Rhynchocephalia from the Mesozoic, having changed little in skeletal morphology since that time, hence the oxymoronic but apt moniker “living fossils”.  It came as a great surprise in the 19th century when it turned out, on closer inspection, that they were not lizards. Though often misleadingly associated phylogenetically with dinosaurs and even crocodiles, they are not closely related to either, other than that they all (including lizards and snakes) are included within the great reptilian group of diapsids. (‘Diapsid’ referring to the two [di] openings [apses] in the cheekbones found in this group, which also includes birds and pterosaurs.)

Tuatara are also famous for having a well developed third or parietal eye, having both a lens and retina, though it is probably not capable of forming an image. The parietal eye is not a degeneration from a once fully three-eyed animal, but a more developed form of a rudimentary sense organ found in many vertebrates.

Once found on the main islands of New Zealand, the single species now survives only on a number of offshore islands, where they are carefully protected. These cool, windswept islands are an unusual habitat for most modern reptiles, and the tuatara have an unusual life history, sharing burrows with sea birds and living a very long time. Tuatara (plural and singular are the same in Maori, though ‘tuataras’ is often used when the word is adopted into English) have long been a favorite subject here at WEIT and you can find more by looking here.]

Two rare ducks. First, the blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos), a “torrent duck” that lives in rapidly flowing rivers, a rare habitat for ducks. It’s highly endangered.

And the pātekeor brown teal (Anas chlorotis), which is making a bit of a comeback:

Lancewood (Pseudopanax carassifolius, Maori name “horoeka”). This is the adult, and it’s one of those trees that develops a crown of foliage only after it reaches a certain height. The younger trees, shown below this one, have thorny, tough, and hard-to-reach foliage. It’s thought that they grow this way as an ancient remnant of their evolution to avoid browsing by the now-extinct moas.

Here’s the juvenile. Experiments using living ratites show that they lose weight if forced to browse on young lancewood, but gain weight if left to browse the older foliage, supporting the “moa hypothesis”

Koromiko (Hebe stricta), a New Zealand endemic with lovely flowers.

Karamu (Coprosma robusta) another endemic plant, like nearly all New Zealand species, has at best small fruit. That’s because birds and bats were the only seed dispersal agent, as there were no endemic terrestrial mammals that couldn’t fly. These are the berries that the keeper (and then I) fed the kõkako.

Easter orchid (Earnia autumnalis; “raupeka” in Maori). Phil detected it simply because, as we walked under the host tree, he smelled vanilla (and so did I). He immediately said that there must be an Easter orchid around and, sure enough, one was right above us. The plant is known for its strong vanilla-ish scent

How many groups of plants can you see here, including the big tree hosting all the others?

44 Comments

  1. GBJames
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Cool stuff! FWIW, I think that building at the top looks like a dalek.

    • Derek Freyberg
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

      They started it when I was a student at Vic (Victoria University of Wellington), and it was very controversial.
      An interesting building across the street is the old Government Building, now the home of Vic’s law school. The building looks as if it’s stone, but it isn’t, it’s made of wood and is the largest wooden building in the Southern Hemisphere, and once the second largest in the world. Here’s a link to the Wikipedia entry, which has photos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Government_Buildings,_Wellington.

    • Dee
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

      I thought the same thing.

      • Dee
        Posted April 1, 2017 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

        That it looks like a dalek, that is.

    • infiniteimprobabilit
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

      Dammit, beat me to it.

      Yes, that’s exactly what I’ve always thought about it. Dalek, that is.

      cr

    • gravelinspector-Aidan
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

      Naaah. It’s the faring/ adaptor assembly that links two stages of a rocket of differing diameter, such as the second and third stages of a Saturn-5. Daleks have the fore-aft versus right-left asymmetry of organisms that have a preferred direction of travel. Kind of like Hoomins.
      I spent far too much time looking at details of the rocket that blew up on a Kennenaveral launch pad a few months ago, and one of the options for that system includes such an adaptor-faring too, complete with the flare made of flat-seeming segments.

    • Posted April 3, 2017 at 11:55 am | Permalink

      I’m trying to remember where I saw it, but I have this strange sense of deja vu when seeing that building – and I’ve never been in the southern hemisphere!

  2. Derek Freyberg
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Wonderful photos – it’s time to get back there! I saw Mount Bruce about 15 years ago, and it would be well worth another visit.

  3. Posted April 1, 2017 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Great photos! The kaka look like such fun birds. Your travelogue is really making me want to visit NZ soon!

  4. Claudia Baker
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    I’m loving this trip around NZ with you!

  5. ThyroidPlanet
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Great post!

    Thanks for camera info – good to know.

  6. docbill1351
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Years ago we had a “famous” parrot store in Houston. One day my daughter and I paid the shop a visit. As we were parking we noticed a couple of adults helping a very distressed child into a car and they roared off, tires squealing.

    As we got closer to the shop I spotted drops of fresh blood on the pavement. As we got closer to the main door the spots got larger and more frequent. Finally, in front of a cage containing a very large parrot was a huge amount of blood. The sign on the cage said, “Danger! Parrot bites!”

    We did not buy a parrot.

    • Mark R.
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

      Parrots indeed bite! My uncle had a double yellow headed Amazon named ‘Magoo’ and it bit through his dad’s (my grandpa’s) hand- right through the fleshy part between the thumb and index finger. OUCH! Lots of blood and lots of stiches. Parrot beaks are no joke!

  7. rickflick
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Extraordinary animals and plants! I’d have to say, for anyone who’s not been to NZ, make sure you go.

  8. Mark R.
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Wow! New Zealand is surely a treasure trove of evolutionary delights. I’m loving these posts, thanks!

  9. hugh7
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    tua = back, tara = spike

    spheno- =wedge, -don = tooth
    punctatus = spotted

  10. loren russell
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    No peripatus at the zoo? No wetas? Or ‘tailed’ frogs? Not to metnion orcs? Keep searching, Jerry.

  11. Randall Schenck
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Learning more about NZ than I ever knew before. It’s geography, biology, history and more.

  12. infiniteimprobabilit
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    That Kiwi road sign illustrated is on State Highway 47, 3 miles east of National Park village and about 400m before crossing Mangahuia Stream.

    Because that’s Mt Ngauruhoe in the distance, with Tongariro to its left, that’s how I know. (That and Streetview for confirmation – ain’t GoogleMaps marvellous!)

    Anyways, Ngauruhoe is unmistakeable from any direction. It is of course a volcano. It’s in Tongariro National park in the middle of North Island. Looks much better in winter with snow down to a few thousand feet.

    https://www.rankers.co.nz/system/experience_images/12191/large.jpg?1364274083

    cr

    • rickflick
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

      Very Mt. Fuji.

    • hugh7
      Posted April 1, 2017 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

      And it is known to a wider audience as Mt Doom, but it suffered so much CGI there’s not much of the original left.

      • infiniteimprobabilit
        Posted April 2, 2017 at 2:29 am | Permalink

        … only to people who bothered to watch Lord of the Rings…

        (Great scenery, pity about the plot 😉
        I’m afraid useless sidekicks annoy me so much it alienated me right from the start of the first movie.

        Also, a great pity if they CGI’d the heck out of it, because – shot in the right weather conditions – it’s awesome.

        cr

  13. Diana MacPherson
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 9:47 pm | Permalink

    Aren’t kiwi birds the cutest? When I first saw an adult, I was surprised at how big it was as I always thought of them as about the size of starlings.

    • infiniteimprobabilit
      Posted April 2, 2017 at 2:32 am | Permalink

      Apparently they’re not as cute as they look. I’ve heard that you have to hold them very carefully because those big feet of theirs with the claws on the end (check the toes on the skeleton with the egg) can do serious damage.

      cr

    • Posted April 4, 2017 at 11:22 am | Permalink

      I have a plush kiwi toy, “Bob”, given to me by the NZ team I was guide for at the International Chemistry Olympiad 1997 (when it came to Montreal). It is apparently close to life-size – and it is more than 30 cm high.

      • Posted April 4, 2017 at 11:23 am | Permalink

        (If anyone involved in that event is reading this somehow: he’s been with me to graduate school and has now joined a rabbit a dear friend gave me, and a Welsh dragon.)

      • Diana MacPherson
        Posted April 4, 2017 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

        I have a big plush kiwi as well that is really feathery.

  14. Ken
    Posted April 1, 2017 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Sorry you missed Zealandia, Jerry, but great that you were able to make the trek to Mt Bruce. Wonderful place!

  15. Brian Salkas
    Posted April 2, 2017 at 2:43 am | Permalink

    “it liked me took from my hand leftover berries from the keeper’s feeding demonstration.”

    That is a bit confusing to read. Maybe its just me, it is 2:45 right now lol

  16. Posted April 2, 2017 at 5:45 am | Permalink

    This is all well and good, but I won’t be satisfied until I see Prof. CC take part in a Haka dance.

    http://tinyurl.com/k9n4xpu

    • rickflick
      Posted April 2, 2017 at 6:22 am | Permalink

      As welcoming as a strait-arm to the middle of the face. 😉

    • Diana MacPherson
      Posted April 2, 2017 at 10:00 am | Permalink

      He can be the guy that picks up the feather or whatever they put down. They often ask for volunteers if you go to Rotorua.

  17. Mike
    Posted April 2, 2017 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    Great photographs,after looking at the size of that egg relative to the size of the female KIWI, no wonder the male rears the chick, she must be absolutely knackered.

  18. nicky
    Posted April 2, 2017 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    Those Kiwi’s, flightless, nocturnal, with a good sense of smell (I gather their nostrils are close to the tip of their beaks), foraging for insects and other crawlies in leave litter, bad eyesight (I don’t know about their colour vision, tetrachromat, like most birds, trichromat, like some primates (including us) and some marsupials, or dichromat like most mammals, or even ‘monochromat’), hairy–like feathers, burrowing, long gestation and care for young… how close to a mammal can a bird get? Except for some seals and bats there were no mammals in NZ before the arrival of the Maori.
    Do Kiwi’s fill a mammal-like niche?

    • nicky
      Posted April 2, 2017 at 9:20 am | Permalink

      Forgot the sensory hairs around their beaks.

    • rickflick
      Posted April 2, 2017 at 11:53 am | Permalink

      Sounds like some of the characters I came across in the software industry. 😉

  19. Doug
    Posted April 2, 2017 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Looking at the size of that egg makes me think that God must hate female kiwis. Was there a kiwi Eve who brought this curse on all her descendants [Genesis 3:16]?

  20. Posted April 2, 2017 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    If any reader wants to know more about what Phil Garnock-Jones is doing at the moment, this is an interesting read that also suits well the scope of this website.

  21. JohnnieCanuck
    Posted April 3, 2017 at 5:50 am | Permalink

    Watch out for ex-cyclone Debbie! Perhaps this warning comes too late.

    In other news, those Satanists are getting in the news in kiwiland. Seems they are concerned about the soles of people there. They are hoping to warm things up for people who need socks and winter wear.

    The news outlet found a Methodist Reverend who was all in favour of their charitable work, as well as a Family First director who was “scathing”. Apparently that rule about religious groups with the word Family in their name, also works Down Under.

    • infiniteimprobabilit
      Posted April 3, 2017 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

      ‘Family First’ is a right-wing activist group (think Law-n-order, stiffer penalties, traditional marriage (i.e. anti-gay, anti-single-parent), Christian, puritanical, anti-abortion, ‘pro-life’ (ugh!), global-warming-denying….) You name everything I loathe and they’re it. Far more objectionable than a bunch of woolly-minded Satanists.

      Their spokesprat seems to be the go-to person for the press when they want a reactionary quote.

      Here’s their policy statement. It’s worse than I thought.
      https://www.familyfirst.org.nz/about-us/frequently-asked-questions/
      “9. We affirm that the world is abundant in resources. The breakdown of the natural family and the consequential moral and political failure, not human “overpopulation,” account for poverty, starvation, and environmental decay.”

      Fuckwits.

      cr

      • Posted April 4, 2017 at 11:25 am | Permalink

        “Natural” being a euphemism for “no birth control for us!” I take it.

        • infiniteimprobabilit
          Posted April 4, 2017 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

          They don’t actually mention birth control. I suspect that in a New Zealand environment, since they’re opposed to abortion _and_ deprecate having kids out of wedlock, publicly opposing birth control as well might seem to be a step too far even for them. They would certainly oppose the ‘morning after’ pill.

          “We affirm the sanctity of human life from conception to death; each newly conceived person holds rights to live, to grow, to be born, and to share a home with his or her natural parents bound by marriage.”

          (Excuse me while I hurl)

          cr


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. […] via Wellington to Puhaka Mount Bruce — Why Evolution Is True […]

Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

%d bloggers like this: