My talks in Singapore

I know I’ve concentrated on the food and sights in Singapore rather than my academic duties, but there’s not much to say about those. On Monday I gave a talk at the National University of Singapore (NUS)—co-sponsored by the Humanist Society of Singapore (HSS)—on the evidence for evolution and why it’s not accepted in America (religion!).

Several biology professors who teach evolution at NUS told me that they estimate 30-50% of their students to be young-earth creationists. That’s far more than I thought, but evangelical Christianity is making big inroads in Singapore and of course many Muslims are creationists. Still, there’s never been a national survey in Singapore of how widely evolution is accepted. And I doubt the government would want that to happen, especially if the outcome shows a lot of creationists.

That talk had a good turnout–between 400 and 600 people, with many students (WEIT is required for some of the biology courses at NUS). You can see 21 photos of that event at this flickr site. The post-talk photo below is my favorite, for I was inundated with curious students (and more than one creationist) after the talk, many of whom wanted their copy of WEIT signed as well as a photo. They were a great bunch!

It looks as if I’m thinking to myself, “Oy vey!”:

screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-12-48-55-am

After that talk, the Humanists to me to a local hawker center, and we had a huge feast of traditional Singaporean food (pictures coming soon).

The next night I was back at NUS, but this time at Yale/NUS College, a separate four-year college that’s a collaboration between Yale University and NUS. It was quite fancy, and this time I had a discussion about Faith Versus Fact with Philip Johns, a professor at the school who was also a Ph.D. student at Chicago about 20 years ago. He was, in fact, in my speciation class then. After our talk, during which Philip asked some good questions, I answered audience questions for about a half an hour.

The flickr photos of that second event are here. The first shows the discussion with Philip (note the luxurious auditorium), the second shows the post-talk Chinese buffet in which I appear to be ignoring the conversation and eating dessert, and the last shows Melissa, me, and John van Wyhe in conversation.

screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-1-02-16-am
screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-1-01-28-am

screen-shot-2016-11-03-at-1-00-18-am

h/t: Tatt Si, head of the HSS, for providing the photos and link, and the indefatigable Melissa Chen for helping arrange all this. I would be remiss to not mention her parents, Michael and Annie Chin, who put me up in their home for a week, proffered lavish hospitality, and introduced me to many of the sights and culinary delights of their country.

12 Comments

  1. Kevin
    Posted November 3, 2016 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Prof CC(E) looks like a movie star. I put my hand on my head a lot; I think I do it because it keeps blood out of my hands.

  2. Mark Sturtevant
    Posted November 3, 2016 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    The first photo does have a striking optical effect that conveys activity and movement. I wonder how it was done. There is a special lens called a lens baby, but I am not sure if that was it.

  3. John Harshman
    Posted November 3, 2016 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Philip is in Singapore? I had no idea. Cool. Also, he does not appear to have aged.

    • philip
      Posted November 3, 2016 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

      Count my chins, John. And recall my hair used to be red. Chicago was twenty years and 25 kg ago. Also, your fellow from the Ernst Mayr Memorial Laboratory of Comparative Ornithology and I were discussing your 2008 PNAS paper, in reference to Jerry’s visit to Singapore. The Right Honourable Doctor Mitra suggested the nesting of tinamous within ratites might be sufficient to disprove evolution. I’ll admit your evidence is surprising.

      • John Harshman
        Posted November 3, 2016 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

        You’re in communication with Shai? Now that’s surprising.

        There are now half a dozen publications independently confirming the tinamou thing, so I guess evolution is dead.

  4. Forse
    Posted November 3, 2016 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Any news on Hong Kong talks ?

  5. Posted November 3, 2016 at 10:44 am | Permalink

    I expected to see you on stage wearing cowboy boots🙂

  6. Posted November 3, 2016 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    I’d love to know what the creationists said to you!

  7. Randall Schenck
    Posted November 3, 2016 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    Such a fancy place they have there. What a place for a talk.

  8. philfinn7
    Posted November 3, 2016 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    As someone who was at the first talk, I can attest that Jerry did NOT wear cowboy boots. Simple but comfortable-looking black sneakers. The talk was great – very informative and entertaining, and it certainly seemed to be appreciated by the mostly young audience. Jerry also said ‘bullshit’. I think, though I can’t be certain, that is was in response to a question about Gould’s NOMA. Getting anywhere near him after the talk was difficult, but I eventually got him to sign my copy of Faith vs Fact.

    • Steven Hill
      Posted November 3, 2016 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

      I recall the “bullshit” in response to a question which I did not hear clearly but was about the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham.

      The event was recorded, so we’ll probably all get a chance to listen again. I hope the second evening was also recorded because I was unable to attend that.

      Jerry kindly autographed my copy of Speciation. Now I have to track down H. Allen Orr!


Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

%d bloggers like this: