Bodypainted wolf

I’ve posted before about the Italian-born artist Johannes Stötter, who does absolutely unique art that uses bodypainted people to create animals. I’ve previously written about his fabulous parrot as well as the frog that made him famous. Now he’s created an amazing wolf using three painted women. WARNING: NSFW, for the women are nude. But though it’s hardly titillating, it’s stunning.

19 Comments

  1. Stephen Barnard
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    It could be titillating to a wolf. The warning should stand for Not Safe for Wolves.

  2. Ross Turner
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    What a wonderful example of a false-positive… brilliant art! Thanks for the link, Jerry.

  3. Vaal
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Very fascinating.

    But in terms of being a model, oh dear the potential for “bodycramp.”

  4. GBJames
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    stunning.

    • GBJames
      Posted June 14, 2016 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

      (and check box check)

  5. Ken Kukec
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    Not safe for work? Who the hell are readers working for? Anthony Comstock? The Legion of Decency? The Department of Prudery?

    • Posted June 14, 2016 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

      Look, whenever a post has nudity in it, I feel like I have to tell readers in case they are looking at it and could get in trouble.

      • Ken Kukec
        Posted June 14, 2016 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

        Just pullin’ your leg, Perfesser. I understand where you’re comin’ from.

  6. rickflick
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    The woman on top sure got the voice down. These things are always quite a surprise when they disintegrate. What’s next? Bald eagle with salmon?

  7. Alpha Neil
    Posted June 14, 2016 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    WEIT turned into a hardcore porn site so gradually I hardly even noticed.

    • infiniteimprobabilit
      Posted June 14, 2016 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

      Hardcore pr0n? Where??? (starts to drool on his keyboard…)

      Meanwhile, Jerry gets mildly rebuked for calling it ‘NSFW’. Just can’t win.

      The ‘NSFW’ was probably justified, simply because a few workplaces who should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves are so paranoid and nanny-ish that anything remotely non-PC is likely to be frowned upon. And the wolf could, I suppose, be called remotely non-PC. I thoroughly agree with Ken that it’s absurd, but absurdity knows no bounds in the service of political correctness.

      As for hardcore pr0n – that was being facetious, right?

      (Nice wolf, btw)

      cr

      • Alpha Neil
        Posted June 14, 2016 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

        Sorry, that was a Simpsons reference. Such things need no attribution where I come from.

        • infiniteimprobabilit
          Posted June 14, 2016 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

          Ah, sorry, I’ll admit to not being very ‘up’ on the Simpsons, excellent satire though it often is.

          Had it been a Python reference I would probably have got it.

          cr

          • Alpha Neil
            Posted June 15, 2016 at 5:29 am | Permalink

            Python eh? How about –
            Is, uh,…Is your wolf a goer, eh? Know whatahmean, know whatahmean, nudge nudge, know whatahmean, say no more?

            • infiniteimprobabilit
              Posted June 15, 2016 at 5:45 am | Permalink

              That one (unlike many Pythons) had a really good punchline.

              cr

            • Ken Kukec
              Posted June 15, 2016 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

              “Rule 1: No Wolfters!”

              ‘ello, Bruce.

    • gravelinspector-Aidan
      Posted June 14, 2016 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

      You want hardcore? This is hardcore!

      • Alpha Neil
        Posted June 15, 2016 at 6:59 am | Permalink

        **masturbates furiously**

        • gravelinspector-Aidan
          Posted June 15, 2016 at 11:44 am | Permalink

          “get your rocks off, baby!”


%d bloggers like this: