Moar bad stuff from Satan (and the Pope)

I must have demons on the brain today. Reader Miss May sent me this picture, and I’ve verified the quotes from Goodreads and Joyce Meyer’s document, “Helping your kids win the battle in their mind.

photo

Meyer is one of America’s most famous religious speakers, a Charismatic Christian who, of course, lives lavishly with several homes and a private jet. Her book on the Battlefield of the Mind for Teens has 4.5 stars on Amazon.

Here’s a similar statement from a man known for his humility, who refuses to live lavishly. I made this slide for my talk in Kamloops, and the quote comes from a radio broadcast last November by the Pope:

Picture 1

The denigration of reason in favor of obedience and faith is, of course, a constant strain in Christianity, both Catholic and otherwise. Nobody made more statements about the dangers of reason than Martin Luther. (Remember, too, that Francis appears to believe in Satan.)

 

h/t: Miss May

106 Comments

  1. Cara
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    Subscribe.

  2. moleatthecounter
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    ‘Theirs not to make reply,
    Theirs not to reason why,
    Theirs but to do and die:’

    From ‘The Charge of The Light Brigade’

    I’d rather charge headlong into cannon fore than worship these idiotic gods.

  3. moleatthecounter
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    ‘fire’…

  4. Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    “Don’t reason, just obey” is the creed of totalitarians like Hitler and Stalin.

    • JBlilie
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:20 am | Permalink

      Just following orders …

  5. darrelle
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    I can’t adequately describe my disgust of Joyce Meyer in a civil manner. I am morbidly curious about whether or not she believes her own drivel or if she is purely a money grubbing carny.

    As is so typical her behavior demonstrates that she does not believe that her admonishment about avoiding reasoning applies to her. Unfortunately for all, not only does her reasoning suck, but when you reason about evidentially unfounded crap it doesn’t matter how well you reason anyway. You still end up with crap. Toxic crap in this case.

    I’ve got no problem classifying this as child abuse. We have laws requiring Rage Against The Machine to have warning labels on their CDs, pure bullshit, but Meyer’s stuff should have warning labels on every page.

    • lanceleuven
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:02 am | Permalink

      That’s a very good point about RATM!

    • Timothy Hughbanks
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

      Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool.
      – Voltaire

    • Larry Cook
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

      You have everything right about her. The part that kills me is that when she’s preaching, she constantly tells the listener exactly what’s on god’s mind and what he means by everything that happens in the world and what god had in mind when the bible was written because although she won’t tell you that god wrote the bible, she will tell you he inspired every word. And she’s the one who can tell us what he meant to say. She also knows what’s on everyone else’s mind. She will tell you what John the Baptist was thinking when he waded into the water. Egotistical only begins to explain her. Narcissistic is more like it. If she believes the things she say then she is psychotically delusional. If she doesn’t, she is a Charlatan and yes, a child abuser. And an adult abuser.

      • darrelle
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

        But she’s such a sweet looking person, she must have our best interests at heart!

        • Larry Cook
          Posted June 10, 2014 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

          Maybe you’re right. But don’t look into her eyes.

          • Jeffery
            Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

            Have you ever noticed that her eyes look just like Michelle Bachmann’s?

            • darrelle
              Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:31 pm | Permalink

              Like limpid pools of stingent darkeness?

              • Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

                I would ditch limpid pools and replace with avaricious pits.

              • darrelle
                Posted June 10, 2014 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

                I think that does work better.

    • Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

      Your last point really struck me as highlighting the insanity of religion: most people, even religious people, will condemn violence committed in the name of religion. They may try to explain away the religious causation, but at least they get that violence is bad.

      OTOH, we have actual laws based on the idea that some magic words – incantations – will destroy civilization if the wrong people hear them. That’s insanity. Especially when you consider that it should be bloody obvious that eschewing reason in fact is a sure ticket to all sorts of awfulness.

      To go OT, I can’t stand the argument some Puritans make that people who swear have an impoverished vocabulary. That’s ridiculous. Swearing serves to convey just how upset you are and how seriously the offender should take you. If I were to try to express my anger with learned, polysyllabic gentility, people wouldn’t think I was upset as I really was.

      In closing: fuck Joyce Meyer!

      • darrelle
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

        HaHahaha . . .

        Regarding swearing means lack of vocabulary, Christopher Hitchens seems like a good example to demolish that bit of wishful rationalization.

        • Posted June 10, 2014 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

          Stepehn Fry, too.

          /@

          • darrelle
            Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

            Oh yes. It would be worth it to draw Stephen Fry’s ire just to hear what he has to say about it.

      • Larry Cook
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

        It takes not just a great vocabulary, but great writing skills to be able to convey the same level of anger and disgust as a shitfuck here and a fuckshit there can convey. I obviously lack those skills.

        • Posted June 10, 2014 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

          Why not be efficient? The hallmark of a poor engineer is an overly complicated design.

          • darrelle
            Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

            A well placed “fuck off” is hard to beat. Especially in response to an offensive blow hard who thinks that as long as they aren’t using curse words they somehow hold the moral high ground regardless of how assholish they are being.

            That’s the flip side of what you have pointed out here. You don’t have to use curse words in order to qualify as an offensive prick. If the meaning is the same the words themselves don’t matter.

            But this is Jerry’s house, and I respect his standards, so I really should stop with the curse words!

        • Posted June 10, 2014 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

          Besides which, I simply disagree.

          No concoction of words acceptable in polite conversation will convey the same message as “fuck!” Words like “fuck” exist for a reason.

          • Doug
            Posted June 10, 2014 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

            I don’t object to cussin’, but I do get annoyed when it is overdone. Hearing someone use the adjective “fuckin'” in every sentence is as annoying (and meaningless) as hearing someone say “like, ya know” in every sentence. Words like “fuck” do exist for a reason, but using them so often that they become routine negates the reason for using them. I agree with Dorothy Parker, who said that vulgarity, like good china, should only be brought out on special occasions. (Not that I always follow that advice.)

            • Posted June 10, 2014 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

              Agree

            • infiniteimprobabilit
              Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

              Absolutely agree with the above and Dorothy Parker. Words like ‘fuck’ or ‘oh shit’ – used as expletives in the right context – can give flavour to language the same way spice does to a recipe. You wouldn’t want spice with everything but it’s definitely missed if it’s not there when needed.

    • Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

      And compared to most preachers on TV, she comes across as the most sensible and level-headed. (:P)

      • Larry Cook
        Posted June 11, 2014 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

        That’s why she’s so popular and so dangerous. She ‘comes across’ as the most sensible and level-headed because she appears to be showing her logic as she goes along and she uses vocal inflection that make her sound reasonable, so when she reaches her conclusion the audience is right there with her as if they thought of it. But she is not sensible or level-headed and certainly not logical. She’s a nut.

  6. thh1859
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    Yet few people were more curious than the profoundly religious Isaac Newton.

    • Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:36 am | Permalink

      Profoundly but heterodoxly, though.

    • thh1859
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:36 am | Permalink

      Come on somebody! Let me have some pithy answers to religionists who bring up Newton.

      • Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:52 am | Permalink

        Being openly non-religious in those times was not good for your health.

      • Timothy Hughbanks
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

        Newton was one of the greatest scientific geniuses who ever lived, but think of how much more he might have accomplished if he hadn’t been hobbled by Chistianity.

      • Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

        It matters not what Newton believed, but what he could and did show as fact. He thought alchemy would work. He was wrong in that, so what makes one think he was right in one more silly thing like religion?

      • Craig Gallagher
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

        Newton, undoubted genius though he may have been, also believed in astrology and alchemy and devoted much of his life to discovering the secret of The Philosopher’s Stone.

        All of which just goes to show that even great minds can be wrong about this or that and why arguments should be judged on their merits, not the status of the person making them.

      • Hypatias Daughter
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

        Newton wasn’t a Christian. He believed he had a personal revelation from God that the divinity of Jesus was a heresy.
        Of course, modern xtians are so fuzzy brained that they either forget or don’t realize that the primary issue for xtians isn’t just belief in God but belief in Jesus as the Savior.
        I have told people that while Newton was both religious AND a scientist, he only was successful as a scientist when he shut the book of God (the Bible) and opened the book of Nature.

        • colnago80
          Posted June 11, 2014 at 5:18 am | Permalink

          It is my information that Newton is best described as an Arian, which belief is considered heresy in most Christian denominations.

    • Chris
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:32 am | Permalink

      Well yeah, but imagine what he could have done if he’d have spent the time that he used for religious study (a lot) on something more useful.

      • thh1859
        Posted June 11, 2014 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

        Wow! The mind boggles. Thanks Chris.

  7. Shaun Hervey
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    When I was a teenager I was fed the line, “Don’t reason, just believe.” It made me question my own judgement, my ability to perceive reality. It was a recipe for insanity. If you can’t believe in your own perceptions, what can you believe in?

    • JBlilie
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:15 am | Permalink

      Yes, but what about that great song “Reason to Believe”? 🙂

      • infiniteimprobabilit
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:57 pm | Permalink

        “If I listened long enough to you
        I’d find a way to believe that it’s all true
        Knowing that you lied straight-faced while I cried
        Still I look to find a reason to believe”

        This is obviously referring to [Rod Stewart’s] trust in his girlfriend, nothing to do with Belief in any gods.

    • Scott_In_OH
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:53 am | Permalink

      This is absolutely right. It’s deeply insidious.

  8. JBlilie
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:15 am | Permalink

    Wasn’t it Rick Santorum who said it was dangerous to send your (Xian) kids to college, where they would learn about things other than religion and learn to think critically?

    I think his specific point was that they entered college as believers and left as non-believers. See reason does work! (For some people, some of the time.) Even Santorum disagrees with the accomodationists.

  9. moarscienceplz
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    if the spirit of curiosity is not a good spirit, how does the Pope explain the 1.8 meter telescope the Vatican Observatory maintains in Arizona? Is it there just for the off chance to see angels flying to and from heaven?

    • Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:52 am | Permalink

      Perhaps it’s for spotting nightjars. Mt. Graham has Mexican whip-poor-wills.

    • Grania Spingies
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:58 am | Permalink

      In the event of aliens, they’ll be waiting with holy water in one hand and a baptismal certificate in the other.

      • JonLynnHarvey
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

        Yes, but what if the aliens are coming here to convert us to !*their*! religion? This was the premise of a hilarious low-budget B-movie in the 1990s called “Invasion of the Space Preachers”.

  10. Paul Monne
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    Curiosity killed the CATholic?

  11. Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:20 am | Permalink

    Another short salvo in the aeons long war of attrition against the ever present foe called ‘Curiosity’.

    These shits would have us be blanks slates for them to write on, to direct and ultimately, to own. Screw em.

  12. Diana MacPherson
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    It’s talk like this that leads to pseudoscience. Also revolutions.

  13. ichbindaswortistich
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    Wait, this is not satirical or exaggerated? Besides, how does one know what [insert your preferred deity here] wants? Ah, right, the people who know [insert your preferred deity here]’s will. Oh well.

  14. kraut
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    “What God leads a person to do does not always make logical sense to his mind”

    Right.

    “Sutcliffe regularly saw prostitutes in Leeds and Bradford. His obsession with killing female street-based prostitutes seems to have originated with an argument over payment, but he later claimed to have been sent on a mission to kill prostitutes by the voice of God. In a meeting with his family shortly after his arrest he was heard to say that “the women I killed were filth – bastard prostitutes who were littering the streets. I was just cleaning up the place a bit.””
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sutcliffe

    Just one of many

  15. Robert Seidel
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    You can go farther back than Martin Luther:

    “For it is written, I will destroy the wisedome of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
    Where is the wise? where is the Scribe? where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God made foolish the wisedome of this world?”

    Paulus, 1. Corinthians 1:19-20

    “Hence men go on to search out the hidden powers of nature (which is besides our end), which to know profits not, and wherein men desire nothing but to know.”

    Augustine Confessiones 10.35.55

    “We don’t want to split ourselves equally between Christ and the world. Rather than lapsing and ephemeral goods, eternal bliss shall be ours.”

    Hieronymus, Epistulae 107, 4.9

    “After Jesus Christ, we have no need for inquiry. If we believe, we don’t desire anything beyond belief.”

    Tertullian, De praescriptione haereticorum 7.14

    • Jeffery
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:28 am | Permalink

      “God said it; we believe it; that settles it.”- On the marquee of a Texas Baptist Church.

      • Mark Joseph
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

        Luke 14.33 is the ultimate response to this bit of religious bullshit: “So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple.”

        It’s almost worth wasting the time to talk to a religious fanatic just to watch them try to explain away this verse, which comes directly from the mouth of Jesus (in their theology).

    • Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

      “…which to know profits not…”

      Hmm. What was the infant mortality rate or average life expectancy in Augustine’s day?

  16. woodshedder
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    The books of the idiot Joyce Meyer were instrumental in the choice of my Christian wife of 25 years to leave me… a move she later regretted.

    Among the gems found in JM’s books is this: “You must decide to believe.”

    What idiocy. Any chosen belief is a phoney belief. Also, any belief which was chosen presumably did not have enough evidence supporting it for it to be believed automatically.

  17. Latverian Diplomat
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:28 am | Permalink

    After all, the Original Sin was eating from the Tree of Knowledge.

    Or, from our pagan forebears, it was curiosity that opened Pandora’s box.

    One of the reasons elites have always found organized religion useful is as a weapon against questioning the way things are, and wondering how they could be instead.

    • Hypatias Daughter
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

      While I think it is stupid to claim credit for another person’s virtues merely because you share some trait with them* (like nationality or sex), I do wear it as a badge of honor that women in both myths are responsible for bringing knowledge to the human race.

      *OTOH, both myths try to blame all the pain suffering and evils of this world on women, so I consider it reclaiming my birthright…

      • Diane G.
        Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

        Nice point. 🙂

    • colnago80
      Posted June 11, 2014 at 5:21 am | Permalink

      Karl Marx said it best, religion is the opiate of the people.

  18. Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    So, Joyce, it was satan who was teaching the logic course I took in college? Damn, I should have looked closer to see whether he had horns!

    • darrelle
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:55 am | Permalink

      It has always seemed to me that Satan was the one character that had his head on fairly straight.

      Now Yoda, that little bastard is truly what a devil is supposed to be.

  19. Jeffery
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Another Babble quote (I forget the location): “He who increaseth knowledge, increaseth sorrow.”

    Any intelligent person who closely examines this mad world of the “insane, greedy, killer monkeys” is BOUND to end up sad and confused; if you’re not, you probably AREN’T thinking!

    • Mark Joseph
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

      Ecclesiastes 1.18

  20. Posted June 10, 2014 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Reason is religion’s greatest threat hence the proscription.

    In reason I trust.

  21. Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Speaking of Satan, maybe it was the devil himself that made Kevin Lowery violate the nation’s Constitution for if Lowery pledged allegiance to the nation, surely he wouldn’t otherwise do such a thing.

    “The devil he has a slippery shoe and if you don’t watch out he’ll slip it on you.”

  22. Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    I think Joyce Meyer is trying to reason. OMg, she is Satan!!!

  23. Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    From an etching by Goya: “The sleep of reason brings forth monsters.”

  24. Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    “Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth; and God has placed in the human heart a desire to know the truth—in a word, to know himself—so that, by knowing and loving God, men and women may also come to the fullness of truth about themselves”
    http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_15101998_fides-et-ratio_en.html

    In light of Pope Francis’ remarks, I’m now thoroughly confused! Oh wait, he said this would happen, therefore God. Henceforth, this shall be known as The Argument from Obfuscation.

    • krzysztof1
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

      Martin Luther is on record as saying that reason is the ENEMY of faith. I think he was spot on. But he was wrong to believe that faith is a good thing.

      • Posted June 11, 2014 at 6:26 am | Permalink

        Hmmm…Maybe if Pope Frank was around 500 years ago, this whole nasty schism and centuries of sectarian violence could’ve been avoided. Nah, who am I kidding?

  25. rose
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    I’m amazed at how some kids or 20 yr olds and older obey their parents wishes.Take the Dugger family of 19 kids you know.Well they won’t kiss until the wedding day or so it seems in the show.They never seem to have a problem with this and just go along.

    • Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

      that’s because they are marrying to produce children for their “army”, not for love. Not hard to not kiss someone you don’t care about but were assigned.

  26. Jonathan Houser
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    I grew up a Jehovah’s Witness and this “line of reasoning,” to use an ironic phrase, is pushed hard in that cult. “do not lean upon your own understanding” and “the heart is treacherous” are two oft repeated platitudes meant to shut down a member who has questions, or disagrees with doctrine. Everyone is to obey the “governing body” (the handful of leaders of the group) and only they are allowed to “lean on their own understanding.”

    They too warn about sending your kids to college. They liken it to being on a life raft surrounded by sharks, and then sending your child to swim for shore even though you know help is coming. The sharks of course being wicked things like evolution, religious studies, secular history, and philosophy. Anything that will help them learn to reason on their own, or contradict the “governing body’s” bizarre twisted version of history. Education is strongly discouraged. Reasoning for yourself is outright banned, punishable by institutionalized shunning by everyone including your own family.

    • Mark Joseph
      Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

      The source for all of this is Proverbs 3.5-6, which I won’t dignify by typing out (or even cutting and pasting).

      When I make up my list of ten most destructive bible verses, that will surely make the final cut.

  27. Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Joyce wrote a manual to demonstrate how poor reasoning results in illogical conclusions. She succeeded spectacularly. Hence, four and a half stars.

    What? She didn’t intend to provide an illustrative example of shit thinking? Oh.

    Never mind.

  28. DV
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    Hey Pope, what leads to confusion is you not knowing what you’re talking about. Stick to social work and stop trying so hard to impart wise words. You’re more inspirational with your mouth closed.

  29. Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    What’s amazing is that I have been saying the same things as Ms. Meyer on my blog and Twitter, but, per Poe’s Law, there is real doubt on whether I’m a parody of extremism.

    I’d say one must wonder whether she’s a subtle parody of extremism, but no, she really seems to mean it.

    On which: Wow. WOW.

  30. Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Joyce Meyer, the classic verminous TrueChristian, who must do her best at trying to tell others not to think because if they did, they’d not buy her books.

    Indeed, if what Christians claim is true, their god does make them do stupid things, like kill their children because God said to and give their money to parasites like Meyer

  31. Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    I think the pope may be a closet Witness!

  32. JonLynnHarvey
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    I recently came across a quote from thriller author Ira Levin who regretted he had contributed to the increase of belief in Satan in America through writing “Rosemary’s Baby”. Unlike the novelist who wrote “The Exorcist” (a believing Catholic and believer in Intelligent Design), Levin was a thorough non-believer who just thought he was writing an engaging thriller.

    He was quoted in 2002 as saying

    ““I feel guilty that ‘Rosemary’s Baby’ led to ‘The Exorcist,’ ‘The Omen,’ A whole generation has been exposed, has more belief in Satan. I don’t believe in Satan. And I feel that the strong fundamentalism we have would not be as strong if there hadn’t been so many of these books […] Of course, I didn’t send back any of the royalty checks.”” (Source: New York Times via Wikipedia article on Levin).

  33. gravelinspector-Aidan
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Time for a Marvin-ism (via the mind and pen of DNA) : “It gives me a headache to think down to that level.”

  34. Jenny
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Spiritual lobotomy – We don’t need no stinkin surgery!

  35. Blue
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    as re “Nobody made more statements about the dangers of reason than Martin Luther,” Dr Rosalind Miles on page 102 of “The Sins of the Mothers,” in her Women’s History of the World, states of among the many of Martin Luther’s statements thus against 53% of the human World, “… … woman was no more than a machine to make babies for him.”

    An oft repeated precept among Martin Luther’s dicta re that least reasonable ( o’course ) of all demographics: female human beings, “Let them bear children TILL THEY .D.I.E. OF IT. .T.H.A.T. is what they are for.”

    Blue

  36. Posted June 10, 2014 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Don’t reason!
    Just .. oh .. pay!

  37. Posted June 10, 2014 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Meyer has an interesting perception of reality. Or should that be delusional??

  38. ladyatheist
    Posted June 10, 2014 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    Oh really?

  39. Posted June 11, 2014 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    Yet the religious will often use reason to explain why competing claims about reality from other religions are false. So apparently, religions other than the one you believe in are not allowed to the use the “ignore reason, what we tell you about God may not always make logical sense” argument.

    I would really like to see a debate involving two fervent believers of competing religions. A Mormon vs. a Catholic, or a Baptist vs. a Shi’a Muslim. I would love to see how, since they both rely on faith, they would support their truth propositions.

    Would it descend into a shouting match about whose Sensus Divinitatus is better calibrated?

  40. Mobius
    Posted June 11, 2014 at 8:04 am | Permalink

    I recall a line from Ivanhoe, made by the inquisitor during the trial of Rebecca…

    “Reason is the tool of the Devil, used to make us doubt our faith.”

  41. Posted June 11, 2014 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think there is any scripture in support of knowledge. Joyce Meyer is just following in the long tradition of the church that has required people to believe because it is impossible and by all standards to remain fools

  42. Posted June 13, 2014 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Good post, but there’s a typo in the title (unless it’s an ironic subtlety lost on me!) – “moar” should be “more”, no?

    • Diana MacPherson
      Posted June 14, 2014 at 6:25 am | Permalink

      It’s a mispelling used for LOLs on teh interwebs. (see what I did there – using context to explain the context). Here is more (or moar).

  43. Posted June 13, 2014 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    Reblogged this on The Atheist .


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. […] Coyne, the evolutionary biologist and atheism advocate, has done just this on his blog, Why Evolution Is True. Coyne presents a quote from a homily Pope Francis delivered last year, in which the pontiff said, […]

%d bloggers like this: