Sympathy for the devil: a parasitic cancer

There are lots of parasites in this world, but I know of only two cases in which the parasite actually evolved from its host. Both of these are cancers. One is the canine transmissible venereal tumor (CTVT), and the other a transmissible cancer affecting the Tasmanian devil.  A paper in this week’s Science (see also this report at the BBC) traces the origin of this cancer to a mutant cell in the nervous system.  More interesting — at least for our purposes — are the evolutionary implications.

The Tasmanian devil (Sacrophilis harrisii; see photo below) is the largest marsupial carnivore, with a range limited to Tasmania.  In 1996, researchers noticed that some devils were afflicted with “devil tumor facial disease”(DTFD).  This is a nasty disease (see photo below), with facial and throat metastases that usually kill the animal.  And DTFD is transmitted by biting, so tumor cells must be in the saliva or gums. (This leads me to suspect that the tumor has actually evolved to make itself more transmissible, since tumors that spread less easily would die off with their carrier.)

Murchison et al. looked at the DNA of 25 infected devils (both the individuals and their tumors) and of 10 “control” uninfected individuals.  The results were intriguing. First, all of the 14 genes examined showed that all the tumors had a similar genotype — a genotype palpably different from (and less diverse than) the devil hosts themselves. DFTD is a clone, which means it had a single origin, almost certainly a mutant cell in a single unlucky devil.

What kind of cell was it? The authors answered that question by looking at the “transcriptome,” the set of RNA molecules produced by DNA, which gives you an idea which genes are actually expressed.  The transcriptome of individual devils differed from that of the tumors, with the tumors showing much higher expression of those genes involved in the “myelinization pathway”: genes that build the myelin sheaths of nerves and fight off agents that attack nerves.

From this observation, the researchers conclude that the parasitic tumor originated from Schwann cells, a particular group of cell in the peripheral nevous systems that act as a neuron “tenders,” wrapping themselves around nerve axons to maintain myelin sheaths and helping those axons grow.

The differential expression of the tumor cells, and the identification of where they came from, gives scientists a marker for identifying the disease, and holds promise for eradicating it.  I have my doubts, though, for research is slow and the disease is spreading so rapidly that it could drive the devils to extinction within 25 years.

The evolutionary twist is that the tumor is now an independent parasite, derived from devil cells but no longer part of the devil body itself.  It can be thought of as a separate organism, genetically free to undergo independent evolution.  And its evolutionary interests are in conflict with that of the host from whence it came.  (The authors don’t dwell on this aspect of the problem.)

It’s not clear where that evolution will go, though. It’s possible that because transmission depends on virulence, or at least on the parasite’s ability to quickly get into the mouth,  the tumor could become more and more virulent, speeding up the extinction of not only the Tasmanian devil, but of the tumor itself.  (Here’s an example where evolution has no foresight!)

Increased virulence is not a certainty, though, for those tumors that kill the devils too quickly won’t get a chance to spread.   DFTD is like a cold: its spread requires its carrier to be active, and so extreme lethality is a detriment.  It may eventually evolve to become less lethal, but that may be too late, for evolution is slow and the tumor is already virulent enough to exterminate itself and its host.

One devil, named Cedric, appears to be naturally immune to the cancer, so perhaps some captive breeding may be in order.

Fig. 1.  A Tasmanian devil

Fig. 2.  A devil afflicted with DFTD

h/t: Greg Mayer

_________

Murchison, E. P. et al. 2010. The Tasmanian Devil transcriptome reveals Schwann cell origins of a clonally transmissible cancer.  Science 327:84-87.

13 Comments

  1. Posted January 3, 2010 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    This…things…are like the anti-naked mole rats. Whereas there has never been a recorded case of cancer in naked mole rats, devils seem to have nothing but cancer. This leads me to wonder, since naked mole rats have essentially two genes for contact inhibition (effectively cutting off cancer from two routes), if the contact inhibition for devils just plain sucks.

  2. Posted January 3, 2010 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    Just think of what ID could contribute to understanding this. Like

    There, that’s it.

    Glen Davidson
    http://tinyurl.com/mxaa3p

  3. Posted January 3, 2010 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Well, as far as I know Cedric eventually got cancer cells in his body – there are some news articles from 2009: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7810933.stm

  4. Adam M.
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Hmm. I read that Cedric wasn’t immune after all, unfortunately. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7810933.stm

  5. Graham Coop
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    I think there is a cancer that is past between hamsters as well (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14280009?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&ordinalpos=2), which from this abstract seems to be spreadable by mosquitoes.

    • Graham Coop
      Posted January 3, 2010 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

      past->passed

  6. Nerdy Biologist
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    Wow this is so amazing…I’m so blown away. I can’t wait to read the paper.

  7. Posted January 4, 2010 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    Fascinating. Wonder what the creotards make of it? A new species that is not of the same “kind”. It also has implcations for their “increased complexity” straw man (as if the genome size of Amoeba dubia wasn’t enough of a problem for them 🙂 )

  8. Helena Constantine
    Posted January 4, 2010 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    This is an obscure area of biology.

    Could expand a bit for lay readers?

    For instance, is this cancer, which you call a parasite, a separate organism? In that case is it a new species?

    • whyevolutionistrue
      Posted January 4, 2010 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

      A very good question. What you call it is a tossup. I wouldn’t call it a “separate organism” or a “new species,” since it’s really a tumor, but some people might (Lee Van Valen, for example, called HeLa cells, which are cells from a cervical tumor grown in culture, a new species, even though they’re not parasitic). This thing is clearly parasitic, but it’s a judgement call about whether you consider it an organism. It does have its own genome and is reproductively isolated from the Tasmanian devil.

  9. Posted January 8, 2010 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    This is fascinating. Couldn’t you say that this is another example of a cell returning to it’s ‘roots’? A cancer cell has already refused the community requirement to die off at command, now it has become mobile. I wonder if we will find other examples of this? I find it interesting that host/association relationships (predator, parasite, symbiont, etc) exist on all levels from the molecular to between species. Now a virulent cancer not spread by virus but cell.

  10. Griffano
    Posted June 17, 2010 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Wait, it’s a parasite like a stomach worm for dogs and such, right? Well, if so, think of about what we do to treat? What if we can make a treatment? I’m not saying a cure, just a treatment to slow the infection. And second, couldn’t we just try an remove the virus before it becomes unstable?

  11. Posted October 22, 2011 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    My sister’s IBS turned out to be severe Blastocystis hominis. After rounds of drugs we turned to homeopathic remedies because of the side effects. Look into something called Para 90. It’s a combination of several herbs that drew the parasites right out within days. http://www.para90.com


3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] next step is to see why Cedric may be resistant to the disease, which Jerry Coyne has deemed “can be regarded as a separate organism, genetically free to undergo in… (The syntax is correct, but for clarity, it’s the disease that can be regarded as a separate […]

  2. […] update update: Actually, I was getting articles from a recent blog post which had out-of-date references. Cedric proved to be a dead-end close to a year […]

  3. […] Here is an interesting post about “parasitic cancer”: There are lots of parasites in this world, but I know of only two cases in which the parasite […]

%d bloggers like this: