Paris lunch, day 2

While I arrived here Saturday afternoon, the full-scale lunching didn’t begin until I recovered on Monday. The plan, which I’ve worked out over the years, is to have walking/sightseeing activities in the morning, a big slap-up lunch at 12:30 or so, and then either a nap or light afternoon activities. There’s only coffee for breakfast and no dinner; ergo, I can eat a lot but not gain weight. The walking also helps: yesterday there must have been four hours on the hoof.

For lunch yesterday I returned to one of the first places I ate in Paris—when I moved here in the fall of 1989 for a six-month sabbatical. I lived in a tiny garret apartment on the Rue Jacob in the 6th Arrondissement: the literary area of the Left Bank.

Although I worked way out in the suburbs, nothing was going to stop me from living in the center of Paris. Every day I commuted an hour each way to the CNRS evolutionary biology labs in the suburb of Gif-sur-Yvette; but I didn’t mind the long commute (the only time in my life I haven’t walked or biked to work) because I was living in Paris!

The food here is, of course, a revelation to nearly all Americans, and as I learned about the restaurant culture and how to eat, I worked my way up from cheap student dives to fancier bistros and restaurants (I conserved funds by having a quotidian dinner at home of salad, a baguette, and France’s fantastic cheese). But our go-to restaurant in the neighborhood was La Lozère, a humble but wonderful bistro specializing in the hearty food of the Lozére, a department in southern France.

I hadn’t eaten there since I left Paris in the summer of 1990, but looked it up to discover it wasn’t only still going, but also had really good reviews. And so to lunch again—28 years later. But first, a brisk three-hour walk through the Marais, an old and colorful area of town.

One of the few medieval half-timbered buildings left in Paris:

Below is the Agoudas Hakehilos synagogue in the Marais, the only Art Nouveau synagogue I know of. Completed in 1914, it was designed and built by Hector Guimard, who also designed the fabulous Art Nouveau Metro signs that you can still see in Paris (e.g., here). The Germans dynamited it and six other synagogues in 1941, but it was restored.

Security at the synagogue is very high, as I learned when I watched someone with an appointment try to get in (sadly, there was no chance of me going inside, though I’d love to see the interior). This is, of course, because of the terrorist attacks on Jews in Paris.

A 17th century carving of a winemaker on a building across the Seine, just one of the many  uncelebrated sculptures you can see if you keep your eyes peeled while walking around the city.

Some of the shops have retained their old and colorful business signs. This store once sold cooked vegetables, but now purveys confectionary from Provence. The Parisians are rightfully proud of their history.

Crossing from the Marais to the Left Bank and the Quai de la Tournelle, you get a great view of Notre Dame, with all the buttresses flying:

Here is La Lozère, exactly as it was three decades ago. It’s near the Place St. Michel: one of the few decent bistros in the area. (Allard is also near, but pricier, and I’ve not eaten there.) And, I found, it’s still very good.

The cozy interior. I reserved for noon, half an hour earlier than usual, and by 12:30 the place was full of diners who had reservations. Lots of others without reservations tried to get in, but were turned away. And everyone inside (except two of us) were French. Wine at lunch is de rigueur, though I don’t know how French workers can be productive after a bibulous lunch.

Appetizers: Charcuterie from the Lozére and foie gras sauteed with pears (note: anyone wishing to comment adversely on my choice of food should immediately leave this site). The wine is an inexpensive specimen from the region, a Côtes du Roussillon. (I never drink fancy or pricey wines in Paris.)

One difference from when I ate here in 1989-1990: back then, the charcuterie was a huge basket of whole sausages and a knife; you’d cut your own portions—as much as you wanted. But you still get cornichons (small gherkins) and butter to go with the excellent bread (which you do cut yourself from a big half loaf).

Lamb chops. The only misstep in the meal was that they were overcooked: they should be pink in the middle. Shredded squash and potatoes are on the side.

Duck breast (god help me). This was properly cooked: rosé, as a good magret de canard should be. But I am doubly damned, for this was not only duck, but it was cooked with HONEY. Honey! Potatoes and squash are on the side here, too:

The desserts were superb: a flaky apple tart with puff pastry, whipped cream, and dark honey, and a fantastic chestnut cake with a chocolate center and vanilla cream on the side. It’s chestnut season, and today I bought myself a special treat: marrons glacés, or candied chesnuts, which I adore.

I’d never had chestnut cake before, nor do I know how it’s made, but it was wonderful, with a heavy flavor of chestnut that melded perfectly with the coeur chocolat.

Jesus ‘n’ Mo ‘n’ Xmas Wars

Today’s Jesus and Mo, called “plays,” deals with the annual Dueling Persecution of Christians vs. Muslims.

BTW, the strip will be all of 13 years old on November 23. You can become a Patreon here, and there’s a special offer if you donate $4 per month or more:

LIMITED TIME PATREON OFFER
From now until that date, anyone becoming a $4 per month patron (or raising their existing pledge to $4) gets sent a signed, dedicated A5 J&M print of their choice – an ideal Xmas present or gift to self (say which comic and who you want it dedicated to in an email or Patreon message). This is a limited time offer which ends on Nov 23.

That’s a lovely offer, and there are lots of strips to choose from. And be sure to tell ’em I sent you!

Weigh in on the elections

I just woke up in Paris to find out that the Democrats have won fairly big in the House, now controlling that chamber, but that the GOP has retained control of the Senate. The governors’ races seem to be a toss-up, with no resolution yet, though I’m not sure why those aren’t as settled as are the Congressional seats.

It is mildly heartening that the Democrats won the House, but that just guarantees a stalemate for two more years, and of course it’s a Republican Senate who would confirm any new Supreme Court appointment, which may be likely if Ruth Bader Ginsburg resigns. Remember, too, that Trump can veto any legislation passed by Congress, and it requires a 67% vote to overturn a Presidential veto.

Given the reportedly big turnout of Dems and groups like Hispanics, this does not bode well for Presidential re-election in two years, which will be the ultimate referendum on Trump. One can hope, but the Democrats must field a good Presidential candidate.

Given Trump’s hateful and confused rhetoric of the past few days, I’m more convinced than ever than the man has a severe personality disorder, and it galls me severely that he’s still in charge. Let’s hope that after January, 2021, he won’t be.

Clearly, I’m not a political pundit, but I’m sure readers have something to say. Your thoughts?

Wednesday: Hili dialogue

by Grania

Today in history, in 2018 in the USA the Dems take back the House, but not the Senate.

1908 – Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid are reportedly killed in San Vicente Canton, Bolivia.

1910 – The first air freight shipment (from Dayton, Ohio, to Columbus, Ohio) is undertaken by the Wright brothers and department store owner Max Moorehouse.

1956 – Suez Crisis: The United Nations General Assembly adopts a resolution calling for the United Kingdom, France and Israel to immediately withdraw their troops from Egypt.

1990 – Mary Robinson becomes the first woman to be elected President of the Republic of Ireland.

1991 – Magic Johnson announces that he is infected with HIV and retires from the NBA.

 

Some notable birthdays today:

1867 – Marie Curie, Polish chemist and physicist, double Nobel Prize laureate (d. 1934)

Man gazes adoringly at smart wife.

1996 – Lorde, New Zealand singer-songwriter

1943 – Silvia Cartwright, New Zealand lawyer, judge, and politician, 18th Governor-General of New Zealand

1943 – Joni Mitchell, Canadian singer-songwriter and guitarist

1951 – Kevin MacMichael, Canadian guitarist, songwriter, and record producer (Cutting Crew) (d. 2002)

1964 – Liam Ó Maonlaí, Irish keyboard player and songwriter (Hothouse Flowers)

We have an embarrassment of riches in the music department this morning.

Today we ge a Hili-selfie, and a look at the creator of the Hili Dialogues.

Hili: If you are looking for me, I’m here.
A: Really?

In Polish:

Hili: Jeśli mnie szukałeś, to tu jestem.
Ja: Naprawdę?

 

Biological Twitter du jour

Scatological events

 

Felid Twitter

This is an annoying ‘cool’ thing to do on Twitter these days; post something going EVERYTHING IS TERRIBLE SO HERE IS MY CUTE THING. Everything is not terrible, but baby cubs are indeed cute in spite of unimaginative people on social media copying each other.

Sarcastic Twitter

I keep telling you guys, the Singularity approaches and we keep teaching them all the tricks and secrets.

Revisionist history

The backup plan

Burger King and McDonald’s need to get a room.

The real leader of the free world

Random things in the world Twitter

 

Current events Twitter

Then there is this: Steve the modern genius. If you live in UK/Ireland this may not actually be a surprise after this naming poll.

Physics Twitter

Canid Twitter

 

NSFW Twitter (Amazing video of baby born in unbroken amniotic sac)

Read More »

Note to commenters about vitriol and frequency of commenting

Although I’m in Paris, I am reading comments, and have noticed two things:

1.) Certain people are dominating threads in posts, and doing it repeatedly. As I said in Da Roolz (rule 9):

Try not to dominate threads, particularly in a one-on-one argument. I’ve found that those are rarely informative, and the participants never reach agreement. A good guideline is that if your comments constitute over 10% of the comments on a thread, you’re posting too much.

Would people please pay attention to this? I don’t like truncating good discussion, but one-on-one arguments that run on and on remain unproductive, and please don’t get one going. Do your comments constitute more than 15% of a thread, and you do that often? Please refrain a bit.

2.) People are sometimes being nasty to each other, sometimes calling each other liars. Please knock it off: there will be no name-calling towards other commenters. If I see this again, I’ll give you a warning, and you’d better knock it off—and apologize if I ask you to. If you are into vitriol, please spew it on another site.

Thank you.

Vitrail in Paris

Vitrail is stained glass, and it’s amply on display in Paris, but nowhere more beautifully than in Sainte-Chapelle, a 13th century chapel reserved for French royalty. As Wikipedia notes,

Construction begun some time after 1238 and consecrated on 26 April 1248,the Sainte-Chapelle is considered among the highest achievements of the Rayonnant period of Gothic architecture. It was commissioned by King Louis IX of France to house his collection of Passion relics, including Christ’s Crown of Thorns—one of the most important relics in medieval Christendom, now hosted in Notre-Dame Cathedral.

Along with the Conciergerie, the Sainte-Chapelle is one of the earliest surviving buildings of the Capetian royal palace on the Île de la Cité. Although damaged during the French Revolution, and restored in the 19th century, it has one of the most extensive 13th-century stained glass collections anywhere in the world.

. . . The most famous features of the chapel, among the finest of their type in the world, are the great stained glass windows, for whose benefit the stone wall surface is reduced to little more than a delicate framework. Fifteen huge mid-13th-century windows fill the nave and apse, while a large rose window with Flamboyant tracery (added to the upper chapel c. 1490) dominates the western wall.

Sainte-Chapelle is enclosed by what was the Royal Palace, but is now largely government offices, including the Palais de Justice. Here’s a view of the very small chapel from the outside:

Okay, forget the crown of thorns (there must be dozens throughout the world), and ignore the fact that much of the upper chapel (the good part) was reconstructed after extensive damage during the French Revolution. The stained-glass windows are almost all original, and, like all stained glass windows of that age, tell Biblical stories in a coherent sequence, meant to inculcate religion (and fear) in a largely illiterate populace.

The next two photos show the same wall, the eastern edge of the chapel. The changing light emphasizes different colors

I’m astounded that the chapel could be supported when most of it is stained glass. Those architects knew what they were doing!

Closer views of the stained glass. The windows were taken down, cleaned, and fixed between 2008 and 2015, an immense job. Then clear windows were placed on the outside to protect the stained glass and prevent it from getting dirty.

Perhaps Biblically-informed readers can identify the panels in the two pictures below.

The rose window on the western wall, taken with an iPhone:

And the lower chapel, now the entry and a shop, with PCC(E) on view (another iPhone photo):

Of course Notre Dame has stained glass windows as well, though they take second place to those of Sainte-Chapelle. Here’s the obligatory vanity photo of me standing by “Point Zéro“, 50 m from the entrance to Notre Dame. This point, marked with a brass plaque, is the place in Paris from which all distances to other French cities are measured. That is, if you’re on a road and it says “Paris, 65 km”, that 65 km ends at Point Zéro.

Here’s the plaque (photo from Wikipedia):

And one of the great rose windows of Notre Dame:

When an atheist like me contemplates, admires, and is stirred by this kind of stuff, I always wonder, “Well, I guess religion did do some good stuff. What about all that religious music, art, and architecture?” I think that had humans not had religion, the artistic impulse for music and painting would have found some other representational outlet, as with the nonreligious Dutch paintings of the 16th and 17th centuries, and there wouldn’t have been so many paintings about Jesus. We’ll never know.

But I’m pretty sure that humanism wouldn’t move people to spend centuries building structures like Notre Dame. What you’d get is stuff like this “humanist temple” in the Marais: the Chapelle de l’Humanité, Built in the 17th century, the building was converted to a “positivist” humanist chapel in the earl 20th century. It’s not often open, and I didn’t go in.

The inscription, which reads “Love as a principle and order as a basis, progress as a goal.” This is okay, but it ain’t no Notre Dame.

One would be foolish to claim that religion didn’t inspire great works of art and great buildings. But one would be equally foolish to claim that because of things like Bach’s great religious music, the Sistine Chapel, and Notre Dame, religion must have been a net good for a humanity.

Enough lucubration. On Sunday it’s a trip to the Cathedral of Chartres, home of the best stained glass in France.

(De)motivational posters on election day

by Grania

Rather than patronise everyone here by encouraging everyone in the US to vote, here’s a few carefully curated demotivatonal posters and tweets. Please add your own  if you have any good ones.

 

This one may be hard to achieve.

Out of the mouths of babes

A horror story from Rick Wilson

How to win hearts and minds

Don’t try to impress people with facts on Twitter (for the record, Docm77 is a German Youtuber)

 

 

Paris: Lunch

In Paris I always eat my first and last meals at the venerable old bistro Chez Denise, also known as the Tour de Montlhéry. I’ve been eating here since 1986, when it was open 24 hours a day (it’s now open only for lunch and dinner). Located in the center of the city, in Les Halles, the place is sufficiently intimidating that, at least in this season, there are hardly any tourists (you can’t see inside, they speak no English unless pressed, and you can’t get in without a reservation, even if there are empty tables). The food, however, is wonderful—and copious! If you’ve followed my Paris travels before, you’ll be familiar with this restaurant.

I always get the same meal, although everything is good. That consists of three courses:

Salade frisée, with curly lettuce, a hardboiled egg, and delicious olive-oil-soaked croutons. I get this because it’s light, for there is heavy food to come.  The meal was accompanied by a liter of the house Brouilly, a substantial Beaujolais. This is one person’s portion of salad:

Main course: Onglet de boeuf, hanger steak smothered with shallots and served with a copious portion of french fries. I have mine cooked saignant (“bloody”: very rare). Délicieux!

En dessert: le baba au rhum, a yeasted spongecake heavily soaked with rum and sided with ample dollops of whipped cream. They give you a bottle of rum on the side in case you want to additionally douse the cake for more inebriation.

I recommend this place highly, and have sent many people here over the years (Seth Andrews recently failed to go: his loss). I always make friends here, for the tables are very close together. This time we sat next to two dignified French ladies, each of whom had a huge copper saucepan of tripe stew (they offered me some, which convinced me that I am not wrong to abjure tripe). I also met a wine writer, who gave me some valuable tips on excellent wines that aren’t expensive.

Anthony Bourdain, rest his soul, also loved this place. Here’s an episode of No Reservations in which he visits Chez Denise and is impressed by the portions. Bourdain’s visit to Chez Denise (I believe he’s sitting at the same table) goes from 19:30 to 23:45. He had blanquette de veau with noodles (veal stew; good choice), probably also the Brouilly, and, of course, the baba au rhum.

 

Tuesday: Hili dialogue

by Grania

Good morning!

Today’s birthdays:

Actresses Sally Field (1946), Thandie Newton (1972), Emma Stone (1988); Garry Gross, American photographer (1937 – 2010), and Catherine Crier, American journalist and judge (1954).

The best I can do for birthday-related music this morning is this one from La La Land, a movie which I haven’t seen, but I think is generally regarded as okay judging from the accolades heaped upon it. The singing, not so much…

 

On this day in history:

1528 – Shipwrecked Spanish conquistador Álvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca became the first known European to set foot in the area that would become Texas.

1860 – Abraham Lincoln was elected as the 16th President of United States.

1913 – Mohandas Gandhi was arrested while leading a march of Indian miners in South Africa.

1944 – Plutonium was first produced at the Hanford Atomic Facility and subsequently used in the Fat Man atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan.

1947 – Meet the Press, the longest running television program in history, made its debut.

 

Hili is doing some soul-searching. I wonder how long this new state will last.

Hili: I’m astonished by the conflict of interests.
A: Whos interests?
Hili: The mice’s and mine.

In Polish:

Hili: Zdumiewa mnie sprzeczność interesów.
Ja: Czyich?
Hili: Myszy i moich.

The Random stuff on the Internet Category:

This probably makes more sense before you have your coffee.
If you’re British or lived in one of Ye Olde Colonies and grew up reading the Ladybird books, you may recognise this style of illustration.

Mimicry

Gorgeous shot of a jellyfish and hitchhikers.

Footage of a rarely seen squirrel.

An angry mongoose (but not a necessarily wise one)

A cautionary tale by Matthew Inman

An optical illusion

And a different illusion of sorts

Not the smartest dog in the world, but quite an adorable one all the same.

Everyone’s hilarious today.

Music of the night

And finally, a rabbit for no apparent reason

 

Hat-tip: Matthew

 

What the Dems need to do to win

by Grania

I watched an interesting discussion with Rick Wilson, who is a never-Trump Conservative. He’s got some good pointers on why Republicans have been able to pull off wins, and what the Democrats need to do to defeat them, particularly in 2020.

It’s worth a listen. If you need motivation to listen, then first take a look at this thread by Daniel Dale, Washington correspondent for the Toronto Star, who has been dutifully detailing all the things claimed at Trump rallies, most of it as one now has come to expect, fear-mongering, lies and manifestly inaccurate claims.

 

Unfortunately, also as one has now come to expect, the intended target audience laps it up and makes its own excuses for the inconsistencies and the unsavory character of the man delivering the claims.

If you have an hour to spare, this is not only interesting but also entertaining as Rick has a way with words, and also hates Bannon possibly more than he hates Trump.