Google Street View discovers new cat species!

It’s Felis bipedus, spotted on Google Street View and posted here.

google-street-view-cat2

I have no idea how this happened, but I’m sure a tech-savvy reader can explain. It apparently involves the compression of images by the Google Street View cars, a vehicle that I never thought about.  Matthew Cobb, who sent me the photo and links, also noted that “There’s an art form whereby people tool around on street view and see what they can find. Some are funny, others beautiful, others bleak.”  You can see examples here and here.

The second link explains how they make the street views, a process involving a fleet of hybrid automobiles that cruise the world, each carrying nine cameras on a single pole, with pictures snapped every 10-20 meters. The photos are electronically stitched together, probably explaining the moggie above.

29 Comments

  1. Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:04 am | Permalink

    I literally laughed out loud. :)

  2. Mary Canada
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    Man that looks weird

  3. Dominic
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    Invasion of that cat’s privacy! They should have fuzzed out its face…

    • Posted May 7, 2013 at 10:12 am | Permalink

      It’s face is already looking pretty fuzzy to me. ;-)

    • daveau
      Posted May 7, 2013 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

      One of those black rectangles would make it ultra creepy.

  4. Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    ps: the glitch is due to the photo stitching software, which takes many pictures and matches what it thinks are common edges to make a larger picture. The oblong shape of the cat’s body (and the fur texture) confused it, since that type of software can unfortunately not (yet) recognize what it is stitching together to define how it’s in fact supposed to look. But I’m sure that won’t be the case for long, especially at Google. :)

    • infiniteimprobabilit
      Posted May 7, 2013 at 11:58 pm | Permalink

      Yes, exactly that.

      Automated photo-stitching software often has trouble with repeated elements e.g. fence posts or legs. This often applies to the easy-to-use software given away with digital cameras. The heavy-duty stuff that does a near-perfect ‘stitch’ almost every time requires the user to first identify a number of pairs of identical points on the two images.

      Of course the time-sequencing of Streetview can also create its own artefacts if something dynamic is happening as the Streetview car drives past.

      By the way, I have found Streetview brilliant for plotting a route, I’m off to France in a month to drive over some remote country with friends and it’s often possible, in Streetview, to read the signposts at the ends of some gravel track which give a good indication whether it ‘goes through’ or is a private road (often hard to deduce that from the ‘satellite view’). It’s a strange experience to be doing this from the other side of the world.

      • Posted May 8, 2013 at 6:10 am | Permalink

        Plotting road trips: we did the same with a friend ahead of a Portland to San Diego road trip. It was invaluable, especially to find those nifty mountain roads we wanted to drive the Dodge Viper we did the trip in on! :)

  5. Sajanas
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    Its a common problem when taking panoramic images of any sort. It shrinks if the animal or person is walking in one direction, and enlarges if its the opposite. I’ve also seen a panoramic image where a cat was stretched out to the proportions of a centipede.

    • JBlilie
      Posted May 7, 2013 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

      That’s an agent in the matrix …

  6. Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:13 am | Permalink

    Could it be a rolling shutter camera artifact?

  7. Diana MacPherson
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:21 am | Permalink

    What makes me LOL about this image is the cat looks seriously annoyed that it got represented this way.

  8. Kevin Alexander
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    Or maybe it’s cat DNA compression, you know, to save on noms.

  9. ATHF
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    It’s Handbanana!

  10. Posted May 7, 2013 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    this isn’t photo stitching… it’s just straight up Photoshop.

    up until very recently there was a feral cat colony living on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada. volunteers would care for the cats daily, and a friend of mine was one of those volunteers. she passed me this photo:

    http://i.imgur.com/7imGZ7o.jpg

    the cat’s name is (was?) Thumbelina, and the original photo was taken in 2003. this was a Photoshop job, not a GSV shot.

    as far as I can tell, this photo was taken behind the Library of Parliament, facing north.
    http://goo.gl/maps/OpUHR
    as you can see by GSV, there’s no vehicular access back there so there’s no way a Google Car could have taken that shot.

    • horrabin
      Posted May 7, 2013 at 10:10 am | Permalink

      Yeah, the patch/clone artifacts & blurring are pretty obvious if you’ve ever used Photoshop

  11. jdhuey
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    I understand the missing back legs but I don’t understand the missing ears.

    • Posted May 7, 2013 at 9:31 am | Permalink

      read my above comment, it’ll explain it all.

    • JBlilie
      Posted May 7, 2013 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

      The beck end of its back is merged over the top of its head.

  12. Draken
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    I’d get the creeps if I were operating that car and came across a couple of street gang boys with guns… Some would simply pop you if they suspected you to be a witness.

  13. Torbjörn Larsson, OM
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    FOTOCHOPS!? WHEN I GIT HOLD OV DAT FOTO KAT, ILL SHOW HIM SUM BETTR CHOPS!

  14. darrelle
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Very cool critter! What planet is it from? Or is it a bio engineered life form?

  15. Suri
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    A bipedal cat. They will inherit the Earth, no doubt!

  16. marksolock
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Reblogged this on Mark Solock Blog.

  17. Posted May 7, 2013 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Oh my ghod! That cat’s got no ears!

  18. Posted May 7, 2013 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    Reblogged this on Marc's WordPress Blog.

  19. daveau
    Posted May 7, 2013 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Tyrannosaurus felix.

  20. Chris
    Posted May 9, 2013 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Quick call Linda Moulton Howe. She’s been looking for the answer to the mystery of the half cats for a while. To do this to a kitty, Google truely is evil !!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29,605 other followers

%d bloggers like this: