A new forcepfly—and a disquisition on insect genitals

“Our faculties are more fitted to recognize the wonderful structure of a beetle than a Universe.”

—Charles Darwin, Notebooks

From Eurekalert we have the description of a new species in a group I didn’t know existed (reference and link to open-access paper below): the forcepflies.  Austromerope braziliensis is the newest species described in the family Meropeidae, one of the smallest insect families (it’s in the small order Mecoptera). In contrast, the family Chrysomelidae, or leaf beetles, contains 35,000 species.

The family Meropeidae held only two species until A. braziliensis was just described (from Brazil, of course).

Wikipedia describes this small and enigmatic family:

The Meropeidae are a tiny family of the order Mecoptera with only three living species, commonly referred to as “earwigflies” (or sometimes “forcepflies”). They are: the North American Merope tuber, and the Western Australian Austromerope poultoni, and the newly-discovered South American Austromerope brasiliensis. The biology of these species is essentially unknown, and their larvae have never been seen. The disjunct distribution suggests a common origin before the breakup of the ancient supercontinent of Pangaea.

They’re called “earwigflies” because their “forceps” resemble the pincers of earwigs, an unrelated group in the order Dermaptera. Earwig pincers (below) are used to capture prey and defend themselves. Their name comes because they were erroneously thought to enter human ears and then drill into the brains with the pincers:

An earwig, Forficula auricularia

An earwig, Forficula auricularia

The new paper in ZooKeys by Machado et al.  shows A. braziliensis with enormous “pincers,” which in this group aren’t defense organs but genital claspers, presumably found only in males (the paper describes only one specimen, and I haven’t found much about the females in this group):

Meropi tuber, photo by Dr. Renato Jose Pires Machado

Austromerope brasiliensis, photo (and those below) by Dr. Renato Jose Pires Machado

 Many insects have bizarre genital structures in males that presumably help secure or grasp the female, and probably arose via sexual selection. (For a great scientific book on this topic, read William Eberhard’s book Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia.) In fact, when two insect species are very closely related, the character most likely to distinguish them is the shape and size of the male genital structures. (This is true in many groups besides insects, by the way). In contrast, the genitalia of females from related species are often nearly identical. Those two facts (I’d call them “Coyne’s Rule”, except there’s already a “Coyne’s Rule” in biology) imply that sexual selection on males is one of the most common evolutionary processes.

How does that selection work? The ability to reproduce is, of course, the sine qua non of natural selection, so one would expect strong selection on those traits connected most directly with reproduction. Any male who is better able to grab and hold onto a female with his genitals will have a reproductive advantage over other males, and this could lead to the elaboration of male genitals. There are other explanations, too, including the suggestion that the bizarre shape of some male genital structures, which don’t seem to help them hold on, somehow stimulate the female’s “tactile preference”, inducing her to mate. (This is called the “sensory bias” hypothesis.) There are other explanations, too, which you can read about in Eberhard’s book. The forcepfly pincers, however, are likely to be adaptations for grasping females, though we don’t know for sure.

Here are the male pincers in closeup:

Ouch!

Ouch!

Eurekalert gives more on the new paper:

A new species of forcepfly Meropeidae (Mecoptera) from Brazil was described, representing only the 3rd extant species described in this family and the 1st record of the family from the Neotropical region. The distribution and biogeography of the family are discussed and it is even proposed that Meropeidae originated before continental drift and then divided into two branches, northern and southern, with the breakup of the old supercontinent Pangea. The study was published in the open access journal ZooKeys.

Despite all previous collecting efforts in this area the species had never been recorded before. The specimen was collected in a private ranch near a forest fragment surrounded by farms in the Atlantic Forest biome, one of the most threatened in Brazil. It can be found in a variety of habitats, including woodland, Jarrah forest, and sand plain vegetation. What makes forcepflies special is the fact that little is known about their biology and the immature stages remain a mystery to scientists. The adults, who are nocturnal and seem to live on the ground, are also capable of stridulation, or the production of sound by rubbing certain body parts.

“The discovery of this new relict species is an important signal to reinforce the conservation of Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. Certainly there are many more mecopterans species yet to be discovered in these forests”, said the lead author Dr Renato Machado from the Texas A & M University, College Station, USA.

Here’s the beast’s head, missing one antenna:

Head

And the lovely antenna, which resembles a stalk of wheat:

antennae

Just for fun, here’s a figure from Eberhard’s book showing a unique and nefarious structure in male damselflies: the “penis scoop.” Female damselflies often mate with several males, and when a male tries to copulate with an already-inseminated female, he uses special structures on his genitals to scoop out the sperm from the previous males before ejaculating his own! That’s of obvious reproductive advantage to males, and instantiates the old adage “evolution is cleverer than you are.” But it’s also of interest that males from different but closely related species have differently-shaped scoops.

One would have thought that there is only one optimal design for a penis scoop, but there are obviously other factors in play here. Different tactile preferences of the females may apply, as well as the possibility that the internal sperm-storage organs of females from different species may have evolved by “antagonistic sexual selection” to counteract the male’s attempts to remove the sperm she carries. And the way a female evolves to counteract the males’ penis scoops may differ in different species.

The recurved spines are used to collect the sperm of previous males and remove them, much like a fishhook:

Picture 1

h/t: A tweet from Ed Yong via Matthew Cobb

____________

Machado, R. J. P., R. Kawada, and J. A. Rafael (2013) New continental record and new species of Austromerope (Mecoptera, Meropeidae) from Brazil. ZooKeys 269: 1–10. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.269.4255

(Note: the link given at the Eurekalert page is wrong.)

14 Comments

  1. logicophilosophicus
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 6:50 am | Permalink

    Just for fun… the “penis scoop.”

    Enjoy.

  2. gbjames
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 6:51 am | Permalink

    sub

  3. darrelle
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 6:58 am | Permalink

    Wow, those “genital structures” look very expensive. They look to be nearly as massive as the rest of the body.

    • Hempenstein
      Posted February 18, 2013 at 7:37 am | Permalink

      Mating is energetically expensive. I recall from a departmental seminar a few yrs back that cabbage moths expend something like 13% of their total body caloric content in mating. If I find a source on that I’ll follow up with it.

      • darrelle
        Posted February 18, 2013 at 9:12 am | Permalink

        Poor guys. It is so easy to see in some species just how dominant a selection criteria sex is in natural selection.

      • BilBy
        Posted February 18, 2013 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

        There are bushcrickets that can expend 20-40% of their body mass in mating

        • Hempenstein
          Posted February 19, 2013 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

          Oy! I guess cabbage butterflies (not moths – I misremembered) aren’t that remarkable after all. I’ve been fwded one ref to them in re. this, tho: Bissoondath & Wicklund, Behavioral & Ecological Sociobiology, 39:285 (1996). 7.6% of body mass in the first ejaculate.

  4. John Scanlon, FCD
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 8:25 am | Permalink

    That’s interesting… Austromerope poultoni is conservation listed in Western Australia (‘Priority 2′, data-deficient but present in conservation lands) and occurs near some places I’ve worked, but never came up on any searches. Maybe it’s a new listing, I’ll check it out. (Not that I generally ‘do’ invertebrates…)

  5. lkr
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    …”Their [earwigs] name comes because they were erroneously thought to enter human ears and then drill into the brains with the pincers…”
    European earwigs do not, of course “drill into the brains”, but they happily shelter during the day in any right-sized cavity. I once found the hard way that an earwig can and will do this.
    On a road trip, a friend invited me to stay over at a commune in Northern California. Had tofu for first time, slept on a straw floor, and woke up with an earwig nestled inside my left ear. Haven’t been able to look at tofu since.
    I’m sure the old Saxon who named the ear-wicce had had a similar experience, only with soft cheese for dinner.

  6. R J Langley
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    I hate earwigs. They are the only thing I’ve ever encountered that I have a genuine squeamish phobia too (not ruling out things I haven’t yet encountered). As I result of my hatred of them I am perversely fascinated by them.

    So, for any readers looking at the above specimen and thinking ‘Oi! Those pincers look nothing like the one on the fly!’, I am able to inform you that the one pictured is a female, and the males’ pincers are more hook-like in shape.

    Check me out, I know some biology! I usually just come here for the god-bothering (not that I don’t find the subject fascinating).

  7. marycanada FCD
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    Amazing images. In the close up of the head, are those double curved structures eyes?

  8. Roo
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    Oh wow. I just started my day with some Fifty Shades of Grey bug porn. I think I need to go swoon or something…

  9. Posted February 18, 2013 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Merope was the name of Oedipus’ foster-mother (her husband was Polybus) after he had been found by a shepherd abandoned on Mt Cithaeron by his real parents Jocasta and Laius, his feet nailed together and hence swollen (Oedipus = swollen foot). I don’t know how this bears on the name of the insect.

    The “penis-scooping” effect has been hypothesized for humans by Gordon Gallup of SUNY, but on the basis of experiments with rigid penis-shapaed dildi that of course lacked a foreskin, an essential element in any evolutionary explanation of such a feature.

  10. Marella
    Posted February 18, 2013 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    Most of those penis scoops don’t look like they’d be much good at scooping liquids out of a female fly to me. Is it quite certain that this is their primary purpose? They look more like ticklers than scoops IMHO.


One Trackback/Pingback

  1. [...] Why Evolution is True has gone buggy again with a post on A new forcepfly—and a disquisition on insect genitals. The first time I have heard of the Meropeidae family, this is one fascinating and as yet [...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27,179 other followers

%d bloggers like this: