Whadizzit?

UPDATE: Go here for the answer.

_________

I took this photograph a couple of years ago. What is it? And where is it?

(Hint: it has a tangential connection to science; bonus points for descrying that.)

Whadizzit?

45 Comments

  1. Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:30 am | Permalink

    Pass

  2. Folderol Man
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:31 am | Permalink

    Spandrels of San Marco?

  3. gbjames
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:31 am | Permalink

    Spandrel somewhere.

    • Alektorophile
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:42 am | Permalink

      No spandrel visible in the picture, however.

      • gbjames
        Posted January 16, 2013 at 6:56 am | Permalink

        Aren’t the four sides showing the top part of spandrels?

        And… I remember a paper or commentary somewhere about why what Gould and Lewontin called spandrels aren’t really architectural spandrels. But I can’t place where I saw it.

        • Richard Thomas
          Posted January 16, 2013 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

          There was an article in the American Scientist (don’t recall the date or author) some years back that pointed out that G & L’s spandrels were actually pendentives; but apparently pendentives are a subcategory of spandrel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spandrel), so G & L weren’t wrong.

          • Alektorophile
            Posted January 16, 2013 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

            I stand corrected. I thought spandrels were just those spaces above arches, but wiki indicates that, as you point out, pendentives like those shown in the picture above are considered a type of spandrel as well. So, once again, I learned something new on this website.

    • Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:42 am | Permalink

      Is that the tangential connection? I’ll buy that.

      But other than it’s looking up into the cupola of some building (cathedral/temple/mosque, court or museum?), I haven’t a clue.

      /@

      • Alektorophile
        Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:57 am | Permalink

        Looks like a dove (aka holy spirit), so a church of some kind would be my guess.

        • Posted January 16, 2013 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

          I can see a Star of David (Mogen David = Shield of David) in the middle. Synagogue?

  4. John Schneider
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:39 am | Permalink

    E.T.’s heart

  5. schneideman
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:41 am | Permalink

    A bank note – perhaps British depicting a great scientist.

  6. MKray
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:48 am | Permalink

    pantheon Paris? Foucault?

    • Alektorophile
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:56 am | Permalink

      My initial thought, too, but its dome looks different.

  7. BilBy
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:59 am | Permalink

    Not sure where but it must be to do with ‘spandrels’, ‘pendentives’ etc

  8. Posted January 16, 2013 at 6:08 am | Permalink

    I agree that it is likely a cathedral and the nexus is spandrel – all we have to do if figure out where JC traveled ‘a couple of years ago’ – yeah, right!! :-)

  9. Posted January 16, 2013 at 6:15 am | Permalink

    A postmodern immunoglobulin M (IgM).

  10. NewEnglandBob
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 6:32 am | Permalink

    I would guess a ceiling dome of a museum or a public building.

  11. Posted January 16, 2013 at 6:59 am | Permalink

    A wild, wild, wild guess: St. Petersburg, The Hermitage.

  12. mday
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:02 am | Permalink

    Looks like a compass rose. Perhaps the line through it represent the Prime Meridian, so you were in Greenwich, England?

    • beyondbelief007
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:17 am | Permalink

      Stole my answer!!

      • Kieran
        Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:49 am | Permalink

        I’m going with Cathedral in Pisa with Galileo and the pendulum, was going to go with prime meridian first

    • gravelinspector
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 9:30 am | Permalink

      The Prime Meridian is defined as the plane of rotation of the transit telescope at Greenwich Observatory. The building’s roof has a viewing slot through it.
      Off the top of my head, the transit telescope was installed in the late 1700s (with subsequent upgrades) and formed the baseline for the Ordnance and Royal Hydrographic Surveys. Similar observatories and survey meridians were established in (At least) Paris and Berlin, and probably others.
      Amongst other things, the global astronomical effort to observe the 1867 (-ish) transit of Venus, and thus measure the size of the universe really threw this confusion of meridians into stark highlight as being stupid and confusing (I did some work curating the online records of a Scottish expedition some years ago ; it’s full of checking of clocks and disagreement about the location of cities), and was (presumably) one of the driving forces behind the establishment of one Prime Meridian and one UTC.
      Anyway – it ain’t Greenwich.

  13. Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    This is a ceiling boss.

    • gbjames
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:21 am | Permalink

      Missing comma? ;)

  14. Lurker111
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:27 am | Permalink

    Image out of a kaleidoscope?

  15. marycanada FCD
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:29 am | Permalink

    A representation of the sun (?) but have no clue as to where it was taken

  16. Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:29 am | Permalink

    Stockholm City Hall, where the Nobel Prize is awarded.

    • Hempenstein
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:44 am | Permalink

      Actually, the award ceremony is in the Konserthus. The banquet afterward is in the Town Hall (Stadshuset).

    • Posted January 16, 2013 at 8:12 am | Permalink

      Yes! That is correct! I knew I had seen this before. It is a ceiling boss in the Stockholm City Hall. (Stadshuset)

      • Hempenstein
        Posted January 16, 2013 at 8:55 am | Permalink

        Cool, hope you’re right. And if you are, now I have an excuse to go back to see it.

        Stadshuset is such a wonderful example of architectural artistry, with its little balconies tucked here and there, gold-leafed celestial symbols from the roof, huge doorways that still keep a human scale. Medieval, mythical, Italianate, and more, all nicely balanced in one package. Also (to me, anyway) amazing that a Norwegian architect, Ragnar Östberg, was selected, given that Sweden and Norway had only separated ~15yrs earlier.

        Anyone visiting Stockholm will do themselves a favor by visiting Stadshuset. And do climb the tower – there are surprises to be seen that you’ll miss if you take the elevator. And tour the building. The blue room that isn’t blue, the giant mosaic with gold tiles, and more. The restaurant in the cellar, at least last I was there, is great, too!

        • Bob Carlson
          Posted January 16, 2013 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

          And do climb the tower – there are surprises to be seen that you’ll miss if you take the elevator.

          My wife and I climbed those stairs in late July or early August, 1976. Northern Europe was having a warm, dry summer, and we ascended the tower in our shirtsleeves. When we got to the top we got a surprise alright, in the form of a blustery little storm with snow flurries. We’d left our jackets in our hotel room. Brrr.

  17. Reginald Selkirk
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    It looks to me like the inflatable roof of an athletic stadium. I would say it’s not a compass rose, because it is six sided, not eight. Maybe it’s a sports stadium in Israel?
    .
    BTW, has anyone else noticed the swastika in the roof of the Metrodome in Minnesota, USA?

    • Posted January 16, 2013 at 8:38 am | Permalink

      Definitely not a secular dome, at least not originally. Enlarge and you will see a white dove, generally denoting the holy ghost.

      • gbjames
        Posted January 16, 2013 at 8:40 am | Permalink

        By gumbo, you are right!

    • gravelinspector
      Posted January 16, 2013 at 9:35 am | Permalink

      BTW, has anyone else noticed the swastika in the roof of the Metrodome in Minnesota, USA?

      No, never been to Minnesota, but why would it surprise. Until some got-up Austrian corporal chose it as his political symbol it was a perfectly respectable icon for “good luck”. Before about 1931-2 it would have had no significant negative connotations.
      Defacing it in 1942 would have been as rational as digging up the Regicides and beheading them. Sure, it happened a lot; but that makes it no more rational.

  18. NoJoy
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    The cover of a special edition of Jonathan Livingston Seagull, featuring the imminent Transit of Venus? :)

  19. Posted January 16, 2013 at 8:47 am | Permalink

    Something to do with Islam and mathematics?

  20. Sigmund
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 9:20 am | Permalink

    I live about ten minutes from Stadshuset and jog to it each morning (well, each morning when it isn’t snowing!) If you go there don’t miss the various statues in the grounds close to the water (the building is right on the edge of Mälaren – the lake in which the various islands of Stockholm are located.

    • Posted January 16, 2013 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

      Sigmund – first, wimp :-) Second, we are waiting for your inside scoop on the next president of BioLogos. I am betting they will take an even sharper right turn.

  21. Posted January 16, 2013 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Alhambra?

  22. Thanny
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    It looks like some kind of quilted fabric. The shape is reminiscent of the inside of a coffin, too. That’s about all I have.

  23. Notagod
    Posted January 16, 2013 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    An electron micrograph of what’s inside a jebus cracker. Science connection is: Where’s the meat?

  24. Posted January 16, 2013 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    God?


Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 18,463 other followers

%d bloggers like this: