Mother lode of flame shells discovered off Scotland

Here’s a bivalve mollusc I didn’t know existed. The day before Christmas, the BBC News reported a stupendously large assemblage of living flame shells (Limaria hians, also known as the “gaping file shell”) living off the coast of Scotland.

A huge colony of an elusive and brightly coloured shellfish species has been discovered in coastal waters in the west of Scotland.

The extensive bed of at least 100 million flame shells was found during a survey of Loch Alsh, a sea inlet between Skye and the Scottish mainland.

That’s about 20 flame shells for every person in Scotland! (I haven’t been able to find a photograph of a huge grouping.) They’re bizarre looking creatures, seemingly more suited to tropical than temperate waters:

_64935801_8294049947_0e17aaa60a_c

The article continues:

The Scottish environment secretary said it could be the largest grouping of flame shells anywhere in the world.

The colony was uncovered during a survey commissioned by Marine Scotland.

It was conducted as part of work to identify new Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).

The small, scallop-like species has numerous neon orange tentacles that emerge between the creatures’ two shells.

Flame shells group together on the sea bed and their nests create a living reef that supports hundreds of other species.

It was conducted as part of work to identify new Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).

The small, scallop-like species has numerous neon orange tentacles that emerge between the creatures’ two shells.

Flame shells group together on the sea bed and their nests create a living reef that supports hundreds of other species.

The story also gives a few “flame shell facts”:
  • Flame shells build “nests” by binding gravel and shells together with thin wiry threads.
  • About 4cm long, they group together in such numbers that the sea bed is covered by a felt-like organic reef of material several centimetres thick.
  • Flame shell beds are found at only eight sites in Scottish waters.

They have a restricted distribution, all around England and Northern Ireland:

uklimhia

The Marine Life Information Network gives some information about lifestyle and habitat

Distribution: Patchy records from off Plymouth Sound, Skokholm, southern Isle of Man, western coasts and lochs of Scotland, and Mulroy Bay, Northern Ireland.

Habitat: Found from low water to ca 100 m on coarse sand, gravel, broken shells and stones. It may occupy ‘nests’ of byssus threads among rubble, under stones or in the holdfasts of laminarians. When abundant, the ‘nests’ may coalesce to form a carpet or reef over shell-sand, which may provide a substratum for kelps.

Description: The edge of the fleshy mantle bears numerous conspicuous, red and orange filamentous tentacles. The shell is thin, solid, equivalve and oval in outline, tapering towards the beaks, and usually about 2.5 cm in length but occasionally reaching 4 cm. The beaks bear an ‘ear’ like projection on each side, the anterior ‘ear’ being more prominent. The shell gaps on both sides. The shell is white in young specimens becoming whitish-brown with age. The shell bears clear growth steps and ca 50 radiating ribs that extend to a crenulate margin. When disturbed this species can swim actively using jets of water expelled by ‘clapping’ its shells together and a rowing motion of its tentacles.

Here’s a photo from the Wikipedia site:

800px-Flame_shells

For more on flame shells, including a diver’s experience with them, go here.

h/t: Chris

27 Comments

  1. Bonzodog
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 5:35 am | Permalink

    Obviously a sub-species: Limaria hians haggii

    • HaggisForBrains
      Posted January 2, 2013 at 7:14 am | Permalink

      Careful!

  2. Griff
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 7:14 am | Permalink

    “They have a restricted distribution, all around England and Northern Ireland”

    Hey, whats that splotch of the coast of Pembroke then?

    We Taffs are always being ignored (sulks)

    • Rod
      Posted January 1, 2013 at 8:10 am | Permalink

      Probably Manxmen as well.

      • Griff
        Posted January 1, 2013 at 8:19 am | Permalink

        Occurred to me after my last post!

    • gravelinspector
      Posted January 1, 2013 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

      Get your tanks on your back and get out and do some more marine surveys then?

  3. Griff
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 7:17 am | Permalink

    Not sure the Scots are going to be too happy either.

  4. marksolock
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 7:41 am | Permalink

    Reblogged this on Mark Solock Blog.

  5. Rod
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 8:09 am | Permalink

    So the next obvious question: Are they edible?

    • Posted January 1, 2013 at 8:43 am | Permalink

      Rod: I was thinking the same thing. Maybe I’m too cynical, but I can just imagine someone saying “But there’s a 100 million of them! It won’t hurt to harvest some. The economy!”

      • gravelinspector
        Posted January 1, 2013 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

        And what are the local fishermen likely to say? Apart that is from “Gerroorf Moi Seee!”
        They’re very, if you’ll pardon the pun, clannish out on the West Coast. For an inshore fishery like this, It would be a spectacularly stupid (or brave) non-local fisherman who tried to mussel (sorry!) in on the area.
        The reef is described as 0.75 Ha. That’s an area equivalent to 75m by 100m. Good luck on finding that without local assistance.
        I can’t find my dive guide for the area, but some of the parts of Loch Alsh and surrounding lochs are well beyond normal diving limits, and some beyond abnormal diving limits. That also implies significant submarine topography (really bad for trawling equipment, if your gear didn’t get “accidentally” cut away by another boat, anyway), and as the ferryman to Skye (either ferry) would often show, there are some real tidal rips around there. Not as bad as the Corrievreckan, but pretty good nonetheless.
        If they’ve survived this long, that probably means that they’re not economical to fish for anyway, even as bait for some other, more valuable fish stock.

        • HaggisForBrains
          Posted January 2, 2013 at 7:23 am | Permalink

          These are wonderful! I spent a couple of years in my youth creel fishing the west coast of Scotland, and never heard of these. Of course, we wouldn’t catch them in the creels, and the trawlers, as you say, would keep well clear of that kind of ground. When creeling for Nephrops, which live in sand, we could co-exist with the trawlers only by shooting creels along the edge of the sand, where the trawlers were too scared to work, so they are unlikely to get to these creatures. Clam dredgers (a very destructive method) would be more of a problem.

    • ladyatheist
      Posted January 1, 2013 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

      My thoughts exactly. If they are edible how long until they are eaten into extinction?

  6. David Schilling
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    Is it sad that the first thought to raise its head was that someone had found a previously undiscovered weapons cache left over from WWII?

    • Rod
      Posted January 1, 2013 at 9:35 am | Permalink

      Well, there was tons and tons of ordnance of all kinds, ranging from submarines to small arms ammunition dumped in the sea off Scotland from ’45 to about the mid-50s.
      Not an unreasonable question to ask.

      • gravelinspector
        Posted January 1, 2013 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

        Don’t forget the thousands of tonnes of mustard gas, chlorine gas shells and phosgene shells that have been dumped in various parts of the British (and French, and American, and German) seabed, mostly after World War 1.
        Most of the British dumping for which detailed records exist are further south – under the Larne-to-Cairnryan ferry route (because there were harbours nearby – “Doh!”). But almost certainly there will be other, unrecorded, dump sites.
        It’s a perfectly normal year when one or several of the harbour towns along this side of the country has the harbour shut down while the bomb-disposal people come in and deal with the unwelcome contents of a trawl. So, “what’s this ‘ere?” always includes a frisson of “I hope it’s not a bomb.”

  7. Posted January 1, 2013 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    I thought it was the Irish, not the Scottish, who had all the redheads…?

    b&

    • HaggisForBrains
      Posted January 2, 2013 at 7:28 am | Permalink

      Wrong – we Scots are part of the redhead Celtic Fringe (poor pun intended), just more handsome than the Irish. These shellfish have beards many a Scot would be proud of.

      • Posted January 2, 2013 at 8:40 am | Permalink

        Well, lesson learned. I suppose I’ll have to cue off of something other than hair color to tell all y’all apart…fifes versus bagpipes, perhaps?

        b&

        • HaggisForBrains
          Posted January 2, 2013 at 9:45 am | Permalink

          Our legendary generosity ;-) is a clue.

          • Posted January 2, 2013 at 10:37 am | Permalink

            So, the Scot will buy you a shot of scotch, but the Irishman won’t buy you a pint of stout?

            Hmmm…how to test this theory….

            b&

            • HaggisForBrains
              Posted January 2, 2013 at 10:51 am | Permalink

              Next time you’re in Scotland I’ll split a bottle of Macallan over your head, sorry, with you. Reflex comment deleted – it would be Bell’s or Haig blended if I split it over your head.

  8. gillt
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    If you think mere flame scallops are cool, check out the electric flame scallop (Lima sp.)

    FYI: you can find both versions in your local aquarium store. They’re pretty common.

  9. MadScientist
    Posted January 1, 2013 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Red hair abounds even in molluscs – it must be something in the water.

  10. Posted January 1, 2013 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Reblogged this on macrocritters.

  11. Posted January 2, 2013 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Reblogged this on sciencekitty and commented:
    These look like the ultimate kitty happy meal – snack and a toy all in one! Where can I get some for my research? I need to categorise the flavour on my chicken-tuna scale. Vital research!


Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 18,371 other followers

%d bloggers like this: