Unbelievable!

Yes, it’s the old Brewer and Shipley tune from 1970, “One toke over the line”—performed on the Lawrence Welk show!  Did they not know what the song is about? Apparently not (see below).

From Songfacts (my emphasis):

This song is about drugs, especially marijuana. A “Toke” is a puff from a marijuana cigarette or pipe. Tom Shipley explained: “When we wrote ‘One Toke Over the Line,’ I think we were one toke over the line. I considered marijuana a sort of a sacrament… If you listen to the lyrics of that song, ‘one toke’ was just a metaphor. It’s a song about excess. Too much of anything will probably kill you.”

Brewer says of the song’s origin: “We wrote that one night in the dressing room of a coffee house. We were literally just entertaining ourselves. The next day we got together to do some picking and said, ‘What was that we were messing with last night?’ We remembered it, and in about an hour, we’d written ‘One Toke Over the Line.’ Just making ourselves laugh, really. We had no idea that it would ever even be considered as a single, because it was just another song to us. Actually Tom and I always thought that our ballads were our forte.” (quotes from brewerandshipley.com)

Some radio stations refused to play this song because of the drug references, but not everyone got this meaning. In 1971 the song was performed on the Lawrence Welk Show by a wholesome looking couple Gail Farrell and Dick Dale, who clearly had NO clue what a toke was. Welk, at the conclusion of the performance of the song, remarked, without any hint of humor, “there you’ve heard a modern spiritual by Gail and Dale.” Brewer & Shipley heard about the performance and searched for the footage, but didn’t see it until the clip showed up on YouTube in 2007.

43 Comments

  1. Hempenstein
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    Another story, another time, another place.

  2. ladyatheist
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    But they mention Jesus so it’s okay ;-)

    • Diane G.
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

      Just what I was gonna say! And Mary! Probably all Lawrence needed to here.

      Still, ya gotta think some guys in the band knew about it–a practical joke?

      • Posted December 3, 2012 at 7:52 am | Permalink

        the guys in the band, the people doing all the tech and set-up, etc were probably doing their best not to keel over laughing.

        • Diane G.
          Posted December 3, 2012 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

          Ha, ha, must be so true!

    • fullyladenswallow
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

      The song does have a revival meeting kind of feel to it, yes?
      Would loved to have seen the Lenin Sisters doing Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds.

    • alphazulu99
      Posted December 3, 2012 at 4:46 am | Permalink

      I’m sure Jesus must have toked a time or two.
      Just never on the Sabbath!

      • Claimthehighground
        Posted December 3, 2012 at 8:10 am | Permalink

        …and he didn’t inhale.

  3. gbjames
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    I’m old enough to remember the Lawrence Welk Show when it was playing live. It always drove me crazy, somehow wrapping up the worldview of those of a “Nixonian” stripe: self-deception, ignorance, and nostalgia for a non-existent past… kind of like today’s Republican Party.

    Ugg.

    • fullyladenswallow
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

      Men….with accordions!

  4. Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    I don’t know, I think Lawrence got it right. It is a modern spiritual. A pretty good one, too. I think they got the drug reference (they are musicians after all). Over indulgences leading to god (usually booze and gambling) is a common theme in spiritual music. They probably just saw this as being a natural progression of the form.

  5. Gasper Sciacca
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:21 am | Permalink

    Reminds me of your conservative radio station WlS in the 70s. They had an acid rock program called SPOKE, with brother John an announcer who spoke through an extreme reverberation processor. He talked about anything and everything and the management were evidently none the wiser. Suddenly one day the program disappeared.

  6. marycanada FCD
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    LMFAO! Ignorance is bliss

  7. JoeBuddha
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Gotta love ol’ Larry. Probably the most racist show I can think of from my childhood. I mean, what kind of “Jazz” orchestra would have no black people (Oh, except for the tap dancer, of course)?
    Mind you, the music was OK, the musicians were pretty good. What always cracks me up is the sea of white when you watched the show. And, given the cluelessness of ol’ Larry, I’d be surprised if the folx who included that song in the play list knew what a “toke” was.

    • jesse
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 10:14 am | Permalink

      In one episode, when introducing the tap dancer, Lawrence finished the sentence with, “… a credit to his race.” I was watching the episode and I cringed when I heard that.

      I consider Welk’s background and the time in which he lived. Yes his introduction of the dancer was racist, but it was a different time and place, and remember that Lawrence himself came from the Great White North (North Dakota) and was born in 1903, only about 40 yrs. after the Civil War.
      Probably any psychologist would tell you that it’s usual that someone gravitates towards the same sort of people or values that they themselves grew up with.

      Was he racist TO that dancer? Or did he employ him because of his talent DESPITE what society would say at the time? I’m not a good enough historian to judge either way.

      Some U.S. Public Televison stations are airing re-runs of his show, complete with introductions by some of his employees/artists. The artists claim that Welk was quite a generous individual. He would find a talented artist and add him/her even though his crew was already huge.

      Is it spin?

      And yes the show is dated, and I myself hated it when I was growing up, as my grandmother watched it all the time. Polyester suits and squeaky clean songs, etc….
      So why watch it now? I am actually quite amazed at the sheer quality of the singers and dancers — the skill of the artists is quite amazing, if you can overlook the other stuff.

  8. Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    One of my former colleagues, whose specialty is popular culture, posted this on Facebook a while back. Of course I reposted it and got many likes, albeit from folks like me who were old enough to remember what “toking” is, and indeed enjoyed the original (and still enjoyable) Brewer and Shipley version while doing so. Do watch the male singer’s hands closely.

  9. Hempenstein
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Not just on YT, what appears to be the Welk show’s website has the same clip on Dick Dale’s page. Ha!

  10. Greg G
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    I think Myron Floren knew what the song was really about and got a kick out of doing the introduction.

  11. Posted December 2, 2012 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    I never got the meaning previously. I always focused on the references to Jesus Christ. It’s interesting how the Lord always wins these battles. :-)

    • abrotherhoodofman
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

      Actually, you just provided clear, irrefutable evidence that religious people tend to ignore things that don’t conform to the Christian narrative.

      And I thank you for that! :)

    • Posted December 2, 2012 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

      So “the Lord always wins these battles” here means blocking information from reaching your brain? I’m actually not at all surprised by this, nor by the fact that you think your inability to perceive things which don’t fit your worldview is a good thing. Ignorance is bliss, I guess.

      • Posted December 2, 2012 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

        You don’t know me.

        • Posted December 2, 2012 at 8:04 pm | Permalink

          I never claimed to know you, and (having read your blog) I’d really rather not know you. But you said that your inability to understand what the song means was the Lord winning a battle. How, exactly, is that not you celebrating the idea that the Lord prevents your brain from receiving information?

          Let’s recap: You never noticed what the lyrics actually say about drugs, you just heard the part about Jesus, and (according to you) that’s the Lord winning a battle. You happily believe that information failing to reach your brain is a battle won by the Lord. It doesn’t matter if I know you or not. That’s what you said.

          You celebrate the idea that god makes you ignorant. That’s what you said.

          • Posted December 3, 2012 at 4:29 am | Permalink

            No. Sorry. You missed the point.

            • John Scanlon, FCD
              Posted December 5, 2012 at 3:16 am | Permalink

              Oh, I get it. There was no point worth mentioning.

    • Posted December 2, 2012 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

      He does? Nobody ever backslides? News to me.

      Just another case of religious people prefering what sounds true over what is true.

      • Posted December 2, 2012 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

        No. I’m afraid you have missed the point. You don’t know me or what I meant.

        • John Marley
          Posted December 2, 2012 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

          So explain it.

          “I’m afraid you have missed the point. You don’t know me or what I meant.”

          So explain it. Jebusite trolls are a dime a dozen. Tell us why you are different.

    • Torbjörn Larsson, OM
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

      What is your double blinded study testing your claimed fact?

    • Torbjörn Larsson, OM
      Posted December 2, 2012 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

      Also, since we know for a fact that intercessory prayer is bad for the victim (if he knows about it, else it is just meaningless), I don’t think having religion meddling in medicine is permissible.

  12. Veroxitatis
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    I guess “We don’t smoke marijuana in Muskogee.”

    • Posted December 2, 2012 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

      But if the video is any indication, they sure as hell do in Durant. :)

      (I love that song, though, even though Merle Haggard is a racist douchebucket.)

  13. Jenny
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    Those of us listening at the time sure understood – wait, not listening to the Lawrence Welk Show . . .

  14. will
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    I like her. She has a nice, breezy unpretentious voice. I’m not sure I even care whether they understand the implications of toking or not. That’s sort of a cheap retro-laugh at their expense. This isn’t a bad performance.

  15. Posted December 2, 2012 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    “Too much of anything will probably kill you.”

    What IS the lethal dose for cannabis? The last I heard it hadn’t been established – nobody had actually died directly from overdose.

  16. Ken Kukec
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    It’s this type of deadpan concatenation of circumstance that meta-fictionists claim place us squarely in the “post-ironic” age.

    I recall a similar experience in walking into the living room to be brought up short by the sight of Donny & Marie Osmond on the tube singing a duet of Steely Dan’s Reelin’ In the Years. They were trading lyrics when Donny looked at Marie (with what I take was a teenage Mormon’s version of a rueful grin) and delivered the line “The weekend at the college didn’t turn out like you planned” — as though mildly rebuking his sister for missing the Saturday chow line at a BYU cafeteria.

    As Philip Roth explained regarding the difficulty of writing contemporary realistic social fiction when the culture continually coughs up characters like Roy Cohn (the red-baiting, arch-conservative, deep-in-the-closet New York power-macher who died of AIDS) — it is an embarrassment to one’s own meager imagination.

  17. cornbread_r2
    Posted December 2, 2012 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    A former girl friend had me in stitches recounting how she and her family were led by her Lutheran minister father in singing the Jellyroll Blues while driving on vacations.

  18. morkindie
    Posted December 3, 2012 at 2:55 am | Permalink

    I can imagine this cute couple sitting on a bench, giggling, and waiting for the train to go back to their home town.

    What could be more wholesome?

  19. Rich Cook
    Posted December 3, 2012 at 8:05 am | Permalink

    Something’s wrong with the harmony there. I’m looking at you, Dick Dale!

  20. dorcheat
    Posted December 3, 2012 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    The accordion player, Myron Floren, during the introduction had a bit of scratchy throat episode. One wonders if he was really was slightly sick or perhaps acting out as a form of subtle disapproval.

  21. Posted December 4, 2012 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    I can’t believe someone else picked up on this! This has been one of just a few videos in the Sprockets Inside employee video library for months. It is a true American classic. Anna one, anna two. . . .


Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 18,407 other followers

%d bloggers like this: